Critical post in this series. Having taken a tour through psychology we are, finally, going to close the circle and converge back upon Christus Victor theology.
Let me first summarize the takeaway from the last post, our review of Ernest Becker's book The Denial of Death.
A key point in The Denial of Death is that self-esteem is involved in managing death anxiety. Living with the specter of death humans seek to live lives that might have some permanence and durability in the face of death. Our cultural worldviews aid in this quest by providing us with cultural goods and values that seem to transcend death. In pursuing these goods and values we follow a path toward meaning and significance. Self-esteem, how we compare to the cultural values, helps us monitor our progress. We participate in what Becker calls "cultural heroics."
While there are psychological and cultural benefits to be had in all this, in the end this is a precarious and fragile business. Our day to day lives often don't feel very heroic. Consequently, we feel that meaning and significance is fragile and shallow. We can come to doubt that our culture telling us the truth. We wonder if working for "the man" is really admirable and worthwhile. The gold watch at the end of a career can seem perfunctory and pointless. We wonder if there is something more to life. But to even ask that question brings on the threat of an existential crisis. To ask those sorts of questions, questions about the validity of the hero system, can bring you to the brink of despair. It's easier to just keep your head down, existentially speaking. It's easier to remain oblivious, to keep punching the time clock and watching American Idol or football games.
And here is where we can see why the bible describes our lives as a "slavery to the fear of death." We're not really paying attention to what is going on. Our cultural hero system and the self-esteem it produces keeps us distracted and oblivious. Sort of like being plugged into the Matrix. This makes life within the hero system feel, in reflective moments, artificial, empty, contrived, and arbitrary. To use a term from the theologian James Alison, we feel we are pursuing ersatz meaning.
And this dynamic leads us to an even darker outcome. If Becker's The Denial of Death helps us understand the biblical claim that our lives are enslaved to the fear of death how might this fear be the work of the Devil? Again, as it says in Hebrews 2.14-15 the Devil is the one controlling this fear. Christ comes to set us free from this fear, to "destroy the devil's works" (1 John 3.8). And while we have come to see how a slavery to the fear of death might make us existentially oblivious and cause us to pursue ersatz meaning and self-esteem, it's not yet clear how this is "the devil's work." What is the connection between the fear of death and the satanic?
This theme is explored by Becker in Escape from Evil, the sequel to The Denial of Death.
According to Becker, the great tragedy of human existence is this. As noted above, our lives are experienced as "significant" because we create cultural hero systems. And yet, our hero system isn't the only one on offer. Every culture has its own values and goods, is its own hero system, that help define what a "meaningful" life looks like. This poses a problem. Our hero systems only "work" if we experience them as immune to death, as something eternal and timeless. In this, our hero systems are religious in nature. In fact, for most of us our hero system is our religion.
So when hero systems and the gods supporting them come into contact we experience an existential threat. The existence of other ways of life, other values, and other gods threatens to relativize our own values and god. That is, our "way of life" is found to be just one option among other options in the marketplace of worldviews. This shakes our confidence that our particular worldview is both true and eternal. If there are many gods how can I be sure my god is the one true god? Pressed further, how can I be sure that all of these gods aren't just figments of our imaginations to help us cope with our death anxiety? Suddenly we feel the existential floor open up beneath us.
In short, alternative hero systems--other values, gods, and ways of life--threaten to undo everything that has made our life feel significant, meaningful, and secure. The ideological Other, in posing an implicit critique of my hero system, threatens me to the core, attacks the very source of my self-esteem. And here's the deal. The ideological Other doesn't really have to do anything to us directly. Their mere existence is enough to threaten us. They represent, on the edges of our awareness, a dissenting voice. A group who doesn't bow to our god and, thus, calls all we hold dear into question.
So what do we do in the face of that threat? It's pretty simple. We demonize the Other. Rather than endure the existential discomfort it's easier to double-down on our worldview and to see the Others as malevolent agents. We aggress against the Other. In mild forms, we see the Other as confused or mistaken, a target for evangelism. More strongly, the Other is an enemy we have to forcibly eliminate.
Here is Becker describing this dynamic:
The thing that feeds the great destructiveness of history is that men give their entire allegiance to their own group; and each group is a codified hero system. Which is another way of saying that societies are standardized systems of death denial; they give structure to the formulas for heroic transcendence....And with this conclusion we have reached the climax of our psychological analysis. Here is how the "slavery to the fear of death" produces the "works of the devil." Fearing death we seek solace, comfort, and immorality from our cultural worldviews. But these worldviews can only assuage our fear if they appear to us as eternal and timeless, as something immune to death. But when worldviews collide, as they do in pluralistic societies, our hero systems are relativized and called into question. This undermines the existential armor we need to achieve a workaday equanimity in the face of death. And rather than endure this anxiety we opt for violence, lashing out at ideological Others.
[Given that] cultures are fundamentally and basically styles of heroic death denial, [w]e can then ask empirically, it seems to me, what are the costs of such denials of death, because we know how these denials are structured into styles of life. These costs can be tallied roughly in two ways: in terms of the tyranny practiced within the society, and in terms of the victimage practiced against aliens or “enemies” outside it...
According to Ernest Becker this, then, is the great tragedy of human existence: That which makes life worth living--our cultural hero system and the self-esteem it provides--is the very source of evil.
Thus we converge, from a psychological vantage-point, on a core teaching of Christus Victor theology: The fear of death keeps us bound to both sin and the devil. And we've come to see how this fear is a slavery. It is a fear that has captured everything around me and everything within me. Death soaks into everything. It soaks the cultural hero system that gives my life meaning. Thus enslaving me to the Principalities and Powers. It soaks my self-esteem, an armor of ersatz meaning and pseudo-significance. And all of it--described by the bible as a slavery to the fear of death--pushes me to become a creature of violence and sin.
And so we cry out with Paul:
"Wretched man that I am! Who will rescue me from this body that is subject to death?"



Hmm... I'm having a tough time figuring this out. Cultural hero systems, death-dealing powers and principalities on the one hand; self-esteem, pseudo-significance on the other. I guess from my perspective as a woman and mom of a teenage daughter, to reject the cultural hero system of beauty and "image" has required me to have the chutzpah to take a strong stand and say 'NO' to that way of living and seeing/valuing myself. Psalm 139 comes to mind as a counter-cultural proclamation of each person's unique value in God's economy. I struggle to get this right, because, did I mention, I have a teenage daughter? I feel a tremendous responsibility to get this right for her sake.
You're moving in the right direction. We've not yet turned to the positive stuff, but will in the next post. In The Denial of Death Becker argues that God is the proper route to self-esteem, but with a key caveat. If by "God" we mean the idol that supports our hero system then, no, this "God" is what produces the violence. But if by "God" we mean something so transcendent and Other then we have a God that can ground our being and is too huge to cause us to agress against Others (because God is often over there as much as he is over here). The cultural god is a possession to be protected and defended. But God can't ever be possessed. We don't "own" God.
I'm still working on the words for all this so forgive the vagueness, but that's the central idea. Discerning between the cultural god and the great I AM. A god we kill for versus a God we love for.
Thanks. I will stay tuned! This is a powerful statement: Finding our identity in a God we love for, versus a god we kill for. Yes! and Amen.
Looking forward to the next post (since it seems that I've waded into the middle of a series). Thanks for sharing your words with us today.
Like like like like - why can I only press that button once? - like like like like...
Breathtaking. Too much to assimilate straight away, but for now I'm reminded of that famous quote by the Liverpool football (that's soccer to you philistines out these) manager Bill Shankly:
"Someone said 'football is more important than life and death to you' and I said 'Listen, it's more important than that'."
Starts to make sense.
I know there's a lot of varied things people dive into to find meaning and purpose in terms of the cultural hero systems. When people lose themselves in their ideologies such that they fail to distinguish themselves from them - and, as you know, this happens a lot among Christian factions (there are no better examples of ugliness than when, say Calvinists and Arminians go at it full throttle, or fundamentalists at anyone who doesn't agree with them wholesale) - how in this world can the Matrix be unmasked? Especially since the Powers and Principalities that proclaim Jesus (churches) are, themselves, part of the problem while posturing themselves as offering the solution? When, for me, church started feeling like death, and the programs like meaningless spinning tops that demanded allegiance, resources and time, I saw a lot of women caught up in those as if their lives and eternities depended on it. Those caught up in keeping the plates spinning look at me as if I've lost my mind, while it seems to me they've sacrificed their souls to the Program.
Hi Patricia
I was about to post a response to Richard's ideas when I saw that you'd beaten me to it in terms of content!
I too was considering how the Church and, indeed, Christians themselves can just as easily set up ersatz 'realities' that encompass their lives and give them a sense of meaning. Yes, I too have sadly experienced the feeling of Church as death and it frightens and chills me that this has for so many become the case.
So, Paul's cry is not just to be rescued from 'this wretched body' but perhaps too from the 'wretched body' that is the Church. Oh dear. How terrible when that which is supposed to aid our salvation actually inhibits and limits it.
Great post Richard - fascinating replies too...
Of anyone I've read, you do the best job of taking dense, theological arguments and discussing them within a context that non-theologians must wrestle. This is a great example of how the slavery of death sinks its tendrals into the often times unnoticed, yet ever present, worldviews each of us carries. This post reminded me of Richard Hughes's book Myths America Lives By, http://www.amazon.com/Myths-America-Lives-Richard-Hughes/dp/0252072200, where he also criticaly looks at how social religion has played itself out in American mythology/our hero system. Dr. Hughes is approaching the subject from a historical and sociological perspective, but if you haven't read it, I recommend it. It is a quick read, but I found it insightful.
My death anxiety definitely pushes me to seek immorality. ;-)
Love this post. One of the things that has struck me as I've followed the Slacktivist posts on the Left Behind books is the way the Real, True Christians (tm) regard non-believers: as either insincere or evil. That is, non-believers in the LB world cannot sincerely believe in a hero system other than Christ crucified; if they say they don't believe, they really DO know the Truth and they're just lying. Usually books aren't so clearly identifiable with their authors/subculture, but it paints a picture pretty close to the crisis of belief that you portray here.
"Especially since the Powers and Principalities that proclaim Jesus (churches) are, themselves, part of the problem while posturing themselves as offering the solution."
Well said, Patricia. It is just that hypocrisy that drove me away from "church." They claim to offer the solution - God/Christ as "savior of the world" - but once you're sucked into their system you find out that their real message is that it's all up to you. They tell us to have "faith in God," as if we can trust Him to succeed in saving not only us but our fellow man, and then we find out that "salvation," rather than being the work of God in the restoration of mankind, is just a reward for our strength... our perseverance... our works. Sorry to get back up on my soapbox, but sometimes I want to respond to the Christian cliché "you can have faith in God," with a sarcastic "to do what?" According to the typical church's "answers," God doesn't actually DO anything -- I either save myself or else.
Your keen observation that the organized church is part of the Powers and Principalities, and thus something that often "kills" us rather than gives us "life," reminds me of the scripture which says, "the traditions of men make the word of God of no effect." I have long since recognized church teachings as the "traditions of men," and have seen first hand how they make the word of God - that He is the savior of the world (not just believers, or the elect) - into an outright lie. Sad, but true.
Like Richard has pointed out, it's a Bait and Switch. Church promotes itself as offering acceptance, authenticity, a soul-saving message, fellowship, etc. Then it clamps down with conformity, acquiescence, hierachy, shaming, guilting into programs/financials, etc.
Exactly.
Love it, Dr, Beck! This post exemplifies the reason why Becker has been so crucial to me - because as I read it, this was the synthesis going on in my mind, and it began to make sense of so much of what is going on around me. I'll admit that the Christus Victor piece was not originally in my thinking quite as articulate as here. However, I think reading your series on Christus Victor here seemed to "click" so easily for me because I had already read Becker's work. It didn't necessarily augment much in my thinking so much as gave me language to give it more form.
Nonetheless, this post is awesome. Pastors need to do sermon series' on this whole thing!
quite honestly
christ is gods hero for a Creation broken through pride and deceit...until we as faithful ones to the father and his mercy.,
we will find a hard road to journey on if we do not realize, we the people of the divine nature are the repository of gods self actualization in a broken world.
carrying on with a hart free from THE FEAR OF death because the trinity was responsible to their VERY GOOD CREATION,AND ARE IN THE PROCESS OF RESTORING THE VERY GOOD THING
ROM. 8
P.S. AND ASKS US THE FAITHFUL...
TO RECIPROCATE THE UNITY OF PURPOSE, OF TRINITY"S LOVE
BLESSINGS
RICH
"A god we kill for versus a God we love for."
These words resonate powerfully within me; love, in this moment, feeling as radical and active and consequential a word as kill. I want to know what this means from the inside of the experience, not merely through the hypothetical.
Dr. Beck, is there any chance that you will turn this work into a book? This series really resonates with me and I can't wait to read each installment. For what it's worth, I think you are really on to something here and would love to see more people diving into this stuff. Thanks for your work.
JR
I wasn't sure at first, but I think, given the feedback, that I'm going to go ahead and pull it all into a book.
I'm glad to hear that this is all going to be worked into a book!
In the meantime, are you going to allow people to read it as a series, with an index in your side bar? I would love to refer people to this series but hesitate because it would take a while to get through all the pages to the beginning, and to find the next posts among all the others...
If you want some "outside reading" on some theological reasoning why we "other" others, and why we humans really are united with one another, I would recommend Christos Yannaras' "The Freedom of Morality". He discusses other things in that work, but most of it has to do with those topics. Really helpful for me. A good source would be Eighth Day Books in KC.
Dana
"According to Ernest Becker... That which makes life worth living--our cultural hero system and the self-esteem it provides--is the very source of evil."
I'm glad I don't have a profundity meter, because I think it would have just broke.
I'm really looking forward to seeing how the Cristus Victor theology works this out.
"According to Ernest Becker... That which makes life worth living--our cultural hero system and the self-esteem it provides--is the very source of evil."
I'm glad I don't have a profundity meter, because I think it would have just broke.
I'm really looking forward to seeing how the Cristus Victor theology works this out.
Yea... try reading Becker first hand. Denial of Death is a 300-page brick to the head. Totally worth it!
That's GREAT news - I'd love to see this in book form with further development of some of the key themes. Keep us in the loop about its progress please...
Principalities/powers = the matrix
Morpheus = Jesus
Neo = You.
Morpheus: The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it. [Neo's eyes suddenly wander towards a woman in a red dress] Morpheus: Were you listening to me, Neo? Or were you looking at the woman in the red dress?
Principalities/powers = the matrix
Morpheus = Jesus
Neo = You.
Morpheus: The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it. [Neo's eyes suddenly wander towards a woman in a red dress] Morpheus: Were you listening to me, Neo? Or were you looking at the woman in the red dress?
Principalities/powers = the matrix
Morpheus = Jesus
Neo = You.
Morpheus: The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it. [Neo's eyes suddenly wander towards a woman in a red dress] Morpheus: Were you listening to me, Neo? Or were you looking at the woman in the red dress?
I absolutely LOVE the soundbite, "A god we kill for versus a God we love for". My only reticence at wholeheartedly embracing it is that in such blanket statements subtlety and nuance can be lost in the desire to encompass a whole doctrine in a proposition.
In other words, to fully endorse this statement leaves us with very little 'wriggle-room' in terms of understanding that part of God's nature and function that might either accommodate violence or, indeed, endorse it in the quest to fulfil a greater good.
Please don't misunderstand me, I absolutely believe in and worship a God who I construe to have love as his ontological core; it's just that I am increasingly coming to the conclusion that this is love by His definition and not primarily by ours. In my opinion, our perception of love can be rather sentimentalised and thus reduce God to a rather wet and insipid version of his full-strength biblical manifestation!
The cross itself, by whatever primary metaphor we interpret it, still remains a gory, bloody and violent debacle and this apparently is God's primary plan for the salvation of mankind and the overcoming of evil and The Evil One. To beat such forces I am supposing that a mighty, powerful and perhaps even violent methodology might need to be employed.
Bottom line - I agree in principle with your adage as a core biblical and theological principle BUT with the caveat that it allows for further appendages and interpretations.
A God of Love? Yes - absolutely and THEREFORE a God who might even be willing to operate outside His own primary attributes in order to achieve that which love requires.
I'm very glad to hear this! Great news indeed. These posts have really clarified a lot of things I was already thinking on with regards to our broken motivations - using our own power to secure meaning, instead of receiving it as a gift.
Martyn, you scare me a little...
As my faith is evolving (e.g., maturing), I am learning a new way to look at the violence depicted in the biblical narrative which is attributed to God, even the "work of the cross" itself. And, disclaimer: I am not even close to being as knowledgeable about this as Dr. Beck and many others who frequent this blog in the commentary.
But, here is another way of thinking about the violent, wrathful God of the biblical narrative. What we see is humanity's incomplete "knowledge" of God and His nature, being acted out in inappropriate (violent, unmerciful) ways, and attributed to God's will. As far as the work of the cross goes, it has been helpful for me to keep a trinitarian view in mind (God = 3 persons) -- in Jesus' very human, physical sacrifice, God offered Himself; and, not so much as a blood offering, but as a SIGN to us of the depth and extent of His love...as a sign -- in the resurrection -- that He can NOT be killed or gotten rid of.
Because humanity has largely failed to grasp and embrace this truth, we continue to perpetuate violence on one another, and often attribute it to God's will. Lord, have mercy on us all.
The only upshot, as I see it Martyn, is that because God is in essence Love, and because He is all-powerful, He is able, ultimately, to *redeem* even the worst of our failures and evil actions (i.e., violence).
Hi Martyn, I identify with your thoughts, and kind of came through the same course over the last few years. Thinking out loud here about what you said that love may not mean what we mean by love, though I agree that it's not mere sentimentality. I see parallels to how some think of God's justice in the same way. And here's why I think that's not so. We're made in God's image, and expected to love, to show mercy, and to do justice. If God's version of those things is turned upside down to how we understand it toward those we love, it becomes such a big mess, and that's when violence and a whole lot of ugly starts getting justified in God's name, in terms of "that's what God does."
I think you're exactly right that justice can't mean punishing an innocent man on a bloody, gory cross to let the guilty go free. It's not justice in our world, and it would turn justice upside down for it to be justice in God's. That's where theories, taught as Biblical fact, have really sent Christianity spinning off into the traditions of men, where man is being saved from God Himself and hell, rather than his own wrongdoing. What helped me see it in this light was George MacDonald's essay on Justice from Unspoken Sermons.
Like Susan, my faith has evolved. And I'm glad, because now I'm seeing God as someone who can be loved and trusted to help me become more true, more good, and more loving in the context of my own life, rather than fearful of God for His wrathful retributions and trying to get a belief checklist "right" to avoid hell.
Hello Susan - I am really very sorry indeed that I scare you a little...
I hope by this that you mean that the ideas I've gently posited scare you a little rather than that I as a person scare you?
On the issue of whether various violent acts have been attributed to God, I guess that brings us back to how we might interpret the Bible and those passages that we’ll take more literally than others. A subjective process at the very best of times.
I am also rather wary of claiming ‘incomplete knowledge’ for those parts of the biblical narrative that we find unpalatable, whilst wholeheartedly endorsing those parts we like and that fit in with our theological perspective.
In a sense, I am really not very concerned in an a priori manner as to what God ought or ought not be like. I love God because of who he is and not because of what he does and if I find a compelling reason to believe that something ‘bad’ has been attributed to him I change my previous outlook to accommodate this new perspective; rather then changing the perspective to fit in with what I already ‘know’.
Yes, I can see that in a very authentic way Jesus’ death was a sign and yet, like it or not, a bloody, torturous and painful sign it remains.
The danger I guess for each and every one of us is the Feuerbachian accusation that Christians merely make God in their own image rather than accepting that they are made in his. The lovely, peaceful, gentle, post-modern, politically correct Christian (and I am NOT saying that there is anything wrong with any of these ascriptions) is therefore wholly likely to describe ‘their God’ in similar terms. Likewise, of course, a similar accusation can be laid at the door of the judgemental, war-mongering and violent Christian...
Oh dear.
What a terrible minefield this is eh? Working it out with other thoughtful, intelligent and reflective Christians is, however, one of life’s GREAT pleasures. That’s why this blog is so very precious.
I hope that I may have allayed your fears a little?
Hi Martyn, no -- not afraid of you as a flesh-and-blood person, as that would be silly, considering the long-distance, digital range of our interaction... Rather, given serious pause for concern, because in your words, I "hear" echoes of the extreme fundamentalist doctrines by which I was initiated into faith in Christ, and which I have seen played out in the evangelical Christian realm of influence with tragic consequences for the Gospel (Good News of Jesus).
Theodicy has certainly been one of the greatest hurdles of faith with which I have wrestled. I do not think that I am alone in this. The problem of pain and suffering in human history leads to the question, "Where is God?" ...And, "What can this mean about His nature and will?"
It boils down to this, for me, Martyn. I could always be wrong in my understanding and interpretation of the essence of God being "love", pure and unadulterated, not fitted to a limited human expression of love which includes the need for violence and destruction, THIS truth claim, based on my knowledge (head and heart) of Jesus Christ, drives who I aim to be in the world, and how I am to express my relationship with God -- the indwelling Spirit of the One I worship. If I am to imitate my Teacher, and our Father, then I have to believe the best about Him. KWIM?
As Roger Olson has said (my paraphrase) of the Calvinist God, it is not a god that I can in all good conscience worship.
I do share with you an appreciation for the dialogical nature of this blog. (Deeply grateful for Dr. Beck's hospitality.) It is good to think deeply about these matters, and work out our own faith with awe and diligence. Iron sharpens iron, as they say. ~Peace~
Huzzah, huzzah and huzzah!!!
[Huzzah (originally huzza, and in most modern varieties of English hurrah or hooray) is an archaic English interjection of joy or approbation.]
Hi again Susan - thanks for your clarifications.
I guess the whole thing for me comes down to us all saying more about ourselves than about God in our attempts to describe Him.
Roger Olson's quote is a case in point. Hope to engage with you again at some stage.