10.28.2013

Best Comment Ever

Now I want you to know that I love all your comments, but a comment that just came in is so awesomely epic that I just had to share it. It may be my all-time favorite comment.

It came in on an old post where I reflect about the intersection of shame, neurosis, and clothing in Genesis 3 and point to some research about the dating of when humans first started wearing clothing. That will help clarify the references to pants in the comment.

Anyway, prepare for some awesomeness. Best. Comment. Ever.:
It's staggering how people with remarkably anemic historical background presume to comment on a subject they so demonstrably know nothing about, but that is indeed typical of so called "mental health professionals," members of an illegitimate occupation who invent names for fictitious "disorders" and who attempt to awe the credulous by projecting expertise in areas where they have no background beyond assumptions. Blending behaviorism with Christianity certainly does yield a bastardized hybrid of profane idiocy. That this guy is on a university faculty is a disgrace. I have a porch glider which is more knowledgeable about history than this tragicomical parody of an educated man. There is no need to post specifics about pants here because a well full of poisoned water cannot be used as a repository for clean H2O. Further contact will be refused as any linkage with behaviorists leaves rational people soiled. This puffed up imbecile would also prove to be a sex-typer of apparel when that has no biologic basis. He lives in Texas and has no cognizance of the equestrian causation of pants. God help his credulous scholastic listeners.
Many thanks to Charles from TX, a man who cares a great deal about the origins of pants. And God help you, my credulous scholastic listeners.

You've been warned.

21 comments:

  1. I wish he had just told us what he really thinks about you, Richard...

    ReplyDelete
  2. What I can't get my head around is how I'd get this sort of reaction on a post about...,pants.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Incidentally, my favorite line, and Jana and I just laughed and laughed about it, is this:


    "I have a porch glider which is more knowledgeable about history than this tragicomical parody of an educated man."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Makes me think of the pants song from MST3K, only much, much angrier: http://youtu.be/UpWOvK-mz7U

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well, I guess you just never know what topic people will become passionate and dogmatic about. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mine is, "He lives in Texas and has no cognizance of the equestrian causation of pants." I love this guy! I love you too Richard, but this guy...well he is in a class all of his own. His piqued my interest in the equestrian causation of pants which is more than you have ever done (for my interest in the equestrian causation of pants).

    ReplyDelete
  7. In my next book, I swear, I'm going to fit in "the equestrian causation of pants" into a footnote.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sing the praises of pants!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I can't tell if the comment is a parody of trolling or not. My money is on parody...it is just too funny.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Fantastic! Any way we can appeal to Charles from TX to come lambaste us on our own blogs?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Here I thought the comments on my student evaluations were fun. I do have to agree with Dan Heck, this is well constructed, so I am going for parody. But if not, even better.



    May you blog a 1000 years and never receive a comment so great yet so withering.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "the equestrian causation of pants" seems like a phrase built for David Letterman and his Worldwide Pants Inc... Pants Across America bit. I can see him using that.

    ReplyDelete
  13. My favorite line "Further contact will be refused as any linkage with behaviorists leaves rational people soiled."


    It's the internet equivalent of the old playground "I've said last word! I'm not talking about this anymore because you are yucky" trick.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Wait just a cotton-pickin' minute! "...That this guy is on a university faculty...in Texas...is a disgrace..." describes qb well into the rounding error. How do you know Charles had his guns trained on YOU?

    ReplyDelete
  15. That's because your head is all puffed up and everything now. Jeez, you are such an imbecile.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Because if he had been talking about you QB, he wouldn't have used the phrase "puffed up imbecile"; he would have used the phrase "puffed up illeist imbecile".

    ReplyDelete
  17. I was most influenced by, "There is no need to post specifics about pants here because a well full of poisoned water cannot be used as a repository for clean H2O."

    After careful consideration....I say enough of Beck's poison, let's go drink the clean stuff over at Charles' blog. Who's with me!?

    ReplyDelete
  18. thank you for sharing. This was a very useful information for me

    http://duhoc360.com

    ReplyDelete
  19. I love this guy! I love you too Richard

    . sharing link one link website http://thietkexaynhadep.com.vn

    ReplyDelete