In the first three posts of this series we discussed declines in American social engagement, focusing on the word "alone." We now move to the second adjective describing trends in American society:
Sorted.
In their book The Big Sort Bill Bishop and Robert Cushing discuss a trend they discovered in American migration patterns, a trend that they call "The Big Sort."
Bishop and Cushing stumbled upon The Big Sort after having examined national election trends at both the national and county levels. The striking trend they uncovered was this (p. 6):
"In 1976, less than a quarter of Americans lived in places where the presidential election was a landslide. By 2004, nearly half of all voters lived in landslide counties."
Think about that. At the national level presidential races are as tight as ever. Yet half of the American population experiences landslides at the local level. Over thirty years ago less than one out of four Americans experienced landslides at the local level. (To see this shift you can look at the election maps at The Big Sort website.)
The explanation for this trend is that over the last 30 years Americans have been sorting themselves into communities of sameness. Four to five percent of the American population moves each year. That is 100 million over the last ten years. And as Americans have migrated across the country they have located themselves among the like-minded. Choosing neighbors that look and think like they do. The consequence has been that, rather than Democrats and Republicans living among each other, they have been moving away from each other. Creating local pockets of partisanship and ideology at the neighborhood level which are offset at the national level. As Bishop and Cushing summarize (p. 11), "Americans were engaged in a thirty year movement toward more homogeneous ways of living."
And The Big Sort isn't only about political affiliation. "[T]he Big Sort isn't primarily a political phenomenon. It is the way Americans have chosen to live, an unconscious decision to cluster in communities of likemindedness. " (p. 15) Bishop and Cushing go on to describe how The Big Sort is affecting all facets of American life (p. 6):
"[U]noticed, people had been reshaping the way they lived. Americans were forming tribes, not only in their neighborhoods but also in churches and volunteer groups. That's not the way people would describe what they were doing, but in every corner of society, people were creating new, more homogeneous relations. Churches were filled with people who looked alike and, more important, thought alike. So were clubs, civic organizations, and volunteer groups...What had happened over three decades wasn't a simple increase in political partisanship, but a more fundamental kind of self-perpetuating, self-reinforcing social division. The like-minded neighborhood supported the like-minded church and both confirmed the image and beliefs of the tribe that lived and worshiped there. Americans were busy creating social resonators, and the hum that filled the air was the reverberated and amplified sound of their own voices and beliefs."
Next Post: Sameness and Shouting
Welcome to the blog of Richard Beck, professor and experimental psychologist at Abilene Christian University (brief vita) and author of Unclean and The Authenticity of Faith.
Experimental Theology is available on the Kindle.
"...tour de force..."
"...left me stunned..."
"...the liveliest voice in the contemporary integration of psychology and theology..."
"...unprecedented..."
"...groundbreaking..."
"...surprising and even astonishing..."
"...deep and important..."
"...paradigm shifting..."
"...a remarkable achievement..."
"...one of the most intelligent and provocative voices in world of theology today..."
The Little Way of St. Thérèse of Lisieux
The William Stringfellow Project (Ongoing)
Autobiographical Posts
- Subversion and Shame: I Like the Color Pink
- The Bureaucrat
- Uncle Richard, Vampire Hunter
- Freedom Fellowship
- Palm Sunday with the Orhtodox
- Looking Like Jesus (or a Crazy Person)
- Freedom Rider
- On Maps and Marital Spats
- Get on a Bike...and Go Slow
- Buying a Bible
- Memento Mori
- We Weren't as Good as the Muppets
- Uncle Richard and the Shark
- Growing Up Catholic
- Ghostbusting (Part 1)
- Ghostbusting (Part 2)
- My Eschatological Dog
- Meditations on Y'all
- Tex Mex and Depression Era Cuisine
- Aliens at Roswell
- Driving to Pizza House
On the Principalities and Powers
- Christian Anarchism
- A Restless Patriotism
- Wink on Exorcism
- Images of God Against Empire
- A Boredom Revolution
- The Medal of St. Benedict
- Exorcisms are about Economics
- "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You?"
- "A Home for Demons...and the Merchants Weep"
- Tales of the Demonic
- The Ethic of Death: The Policies and Procedures Manual
- "All That Are Here Are Humans"
- Ears of Stone
- The War Prayer
- Letter from a Birmingham Jail
Blog Sermons
From the Prison Bible Study
Series/Essays Based on my Research
- Death and Christian Art, Part 1
- Death and Christian Art, Interlude
- Death and Christian Art, Part 2
- Death and Christian Art, Part 3
- Profanity
- Satan and the Emotional Burden of Monotheism
- Death, Gnosticism and the Incarnation
- Summer and Winter Christians
- Sinning in Your Heart
- Quest Religious Orientation
- Satan as a Functional Theodicy
- Attachment to God
- PostSecret, Part 1
- PostSecret, Part 2
- PostSecret, Part 3
- PostSecret, Part 4
- PostSecret, Part 5
The Theology of Calvin and Hobbes
The Theology of Peanuts
The Angel of the iPhone
Reflections on Gender and the Church
- Call No Man on Earth Father
- Head Coverings: Why Female Hair is a Testicle
- A Letter to My Church on Women's Roles
- Pragmatics or Power in Patriarchy?
- Whores: A Meditation on Gender and the Bible
- On Masculine Christianity and Powerplays
- Thoughts on Mark Driscoll While I'm Knitting
- Ambivalent Sexism
- Direct Your Hearts to Her
- Gender, Submission and Ecosystems of Abuse
The Snake Handling Churches of Appalachia
How Facebook Killed the Church
Blogging about the Bible
- Adam's First Wife
- I Am a Worm
- Christus Victor in the Lord's Prayer
- Let Them Both Grow Together
- Repent
- Here I Am
- Becoming the Jubilee
- Sermon on the Mount: Study Guide
- Treat Them as a Pagan or Tax Collector
- Going Outside the Camp
- Welcoming Children
- The Song of Lamech and the Song of the Lamb
- The Nephilim
- Shaming Jesus
- Pseudepigrapha and the Christian Witness
- The Exclusion and Inclusion of Eunuchs
- The Second Moses
- The New Manna
- Salvation in the First Sermons of the Church
- "A Bloody Husband"
- Song of the Vineyard
- The Jubilee
Bonhoeffer's Letters from Prision
Civil Rights Family Trip
Hip Christianity
Demons and The Powers
- Part 1: Thinking about Demons
- Part 2: Evil and Illness in Modernity
- Part 3: Evil as Residual
- Part 4: The Language of The Powers
- Part 5: The Angels of the Nations
- Part 6: Yoder on The Powers
- Part 7: The Spirituality of The Powers
- Part 8: The Inner Aspect of Material Power
- Part 9: Stringfellow on The Powers
- Part 10: Demons in the Gosples
Judas
The Midrash of R. Crumb
Theology and Evolutionary Psychology
- Prelude: Galileo's Dilemma
- Part 1: Natural and Sexual Selection
- Part 2: On the Sweet Tooth (and Morality as Dieting)
- Interlude: Emoticons
- Part 3: Evolution and Human Sexuality
- Part 4: Sexual Jealousy
- Part 5: Kin Selection and Family Values
- Part 6: The Storge to Xenia Shift
- Part 7: Reciprocity
- Part 8: Moralistic Aggression
Scripture and Discernment
- Biblical as Sociological Stress Test
- Cookie Cutting the Bible: A Case Study
- Pawn to King 4
- Allowing God to Rage
- Poetry of a Murderer
- On Christian Communion: Killing vs. Sexuality
- Heretics and Disagreement
- Atonement: A Primer
- "The Bible says..."
- The "Yes, but..." Church
- Human Experience and the Bible
- Discernment, Part 1
- Discernment, Part 2
- Rabbinic Hedges
- Fuzzy Logic
Interacting with Good Books
- Are Christians Hate-Filled Hypocrites?
- Christ and Horrors
- The King Jesus Gospel
- Insurrection
- The Bible Made Impossible
- The Deliverance of God
- To Change the World
- Sexuality and the Christian Body
- I Told Me So
- The Teaching of the Twelve
- Evolving in Monkey Town
- Saved from Sacrifice: A Series
- Darwin's Sacred Cause
- Outliers
- Evil in Modern Thought, Part 1
- Evil in Modern Thought, Part 2
- Evil in Modern Thought, Part 3
- The Black Swan, Part 1
- The Black Swan, Part 2
- Rapture Ready!
- A Secular Age
- The God Who Risks
- I Am a Strange Loop, Part 1
- I Am a Strange Loop, Part 2
- I Am a Strange Loop, Part 3
- I Am a Strange Loop, Part 4
- I Am a Strange Loop, Part 5
- The Evolution of Cooperation
- Evil
- On Apology
Moral Psychology
- Ethnocentrism and Politics
- Flies, Attention and Morality
- The Banality of Evil
- Regarding Sex
- The Ovens at Buchenwald
- Violence and Traffic Lights
- Defending Individualism
- Guilt and Atonement
- The Varieties of Love and Hate
- The Wicked
- Moral Foundations
- Primum non nocere
- The Moral Emotions
- The Moral Circle, Part 1
- The Moral Circle, Part 2
- Taboo Psychology
- The Morality of Mentality
- Moral Conviction
- Infrahumanization
- Holiness and Moral Grammars
Experiments in Quantitative Ecclesiology
The Theology of Everyday Life
- Hating Pixels
- Dress, Divinity and Dumbfounding
- The Kingdom of God Will Not Be Tweeted
- Tickling
- Tattoos
- The Ethics of :-)
- On Snobbery
- Jokes
- The F-word
- Hypocrisy
- Can you sin on a deserted island?
- Ironic Christians
- Everything I learned about life I learned coaching tee-ball
- Gossip, Part 1: The Food of the Brain
- Gossip, Part 2: Evolutionary Stable Strategies
- Gossip, Part 3: The Pay it Forward World
- Sinning in Your Heart?, Part 1: The Morality of Mentality
- Moral Progress, Part 1
- Moral Progress, Part 2
- Human Nature
- Welcome
- On Humility
Dogmatism & Doubt: Curing the Religious Disease
Sticky Theology (Why is Bad Theology so Popular?)
Universal Reconciliation
- Holiness in Heaven?
- Universalism and the New Perspective on Paul
- A Googolplexian Hell
- The Best Ending to the Christian Story: An Exchange with Daniel Kirk
- Universalism and the Bondage of the Will
- Universalism and the Prophetic Imagination
- Universalism and Theodicy
- Universalism FAQ & Answers
- Universalism: A Summary Defense
- Why I Am a Universalist Series (and Resources)
George MacDonald
Alone, Suburban & Sorted
The Theology of Monsters
Original Sin: A New View
The Theology of Ugly
Orthodox Iconography
A Walk with William James
- Part 1: The Jamesian Situation
- Part 2: Habit
- Part 3: Belief as Vote
- Part 4: Pragmatism and the Emerging Church
- Part 5: Theology is a Fork
- Part 6: Ontological Emotion
- Part 7: Religious Surrender
- Part 8: Introverts at Church
- Part 9: Bubbles in the Sun
- Part 10: Ghostbusting
- Part 11: The Empirical Trace
- Part 12: Saintliness
Preparing for the Cartesian Storm (Free Will & Souls in the Age of Neuroscience)
Musings On Faith, Belief, and Doubt
- Cheap Praise and Costly Praise
- god
- Wired to Suffer
- A New Apologetics
- Orthodox Alexithymia
- High and Low: The Psalms and Suffering
- The Buddhist Phase
- Skilled Christianity
- The Two Families of God
- The Bait and Switch of Contemporary Christianity
- Evil and Evolution: Thoughts on Enns and Smith
- Theodicy and No Country for Old Men
- Doubt: A Diagnosis
- Faith and Modernity
- Faith after "The Cognitive Turn"
- Salvation
- The Gifts of Doubt
- A Beautiful Life
- Is Santa Claus Real?
- The Feeling of Knowing
- Practicing Christianity
- In Praise of Doubt
- Skepticism and Conviction
- Pragmatic Belief
- N-Order Complaint and Need for Cognition
The Theology of Humor
Game Theory and the Kingdom of God
Holiday Musings
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 1
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 2
- It's Still Christmas
- Easter Shouldn't Be Good News
- The Deeper Magic: A Good Friday Meditation
- Palm Sunday with the Orthodox
- Growing Up Catholic: A Lenten Meditation
- The Liturgical Year for Dummies
- "Watching Their Flocks at Night": An Advent Meditation
- Pentecost and Babel
- Epiphany
- Ambivalence about Lent
- On Easter and Astronomy
- Christmas & TV, Part 1: The Grinch
- Christmas & TV, Part 2: Misfits
- Christmas & TV, Part 3: Charlie Brown
- Sex Sandals and Advent
- Freud and Valentine's Day
- Existentialism and Halloween
- Halloween Redux: Talking with the Dead
The Offbeat
- Jesus Would Be a Hufflepuff
- The Moral Example of Captain Jack Sparrow
- Weddings Real, Imagined and Yet to Come
- Michelangelo and Neuroanatomy
- Believing in Bigfoot
- The Kingdom of God as Improv and Flash Mob
- 2012 and the End of the World
- Chocolate Jesus
- The Polar Express and the Uncanny Valley
- Why the Anti-Christ Is an Idiot
- On Harry Potter and Vampire Movies

Richard,
Clearly, I haven't read the book but it seems to me that at least some who have chosen to live in my neighborhood haven't done so because of like-mindedness and hence belie "sorting" theory. Sameness compared to what. Birds of a feather?
Unless Bishop and Cushing mean that those folk (multicultural but middle class affluent) were likeminded regards the neighborhood only. Motives are, it seems to me, very much mixed when examined at the microlevel. My wife and I chose to live where we are for two reasons: (1)proximity to children and grandchildren, and (2) the availability of a downsized, one-story empty-nester (we could afford a larger and more expensive house but chose to forego it.)
We are also members of a church far more theologically conservative than we. We are what you might call kindly porcupines--the church doesn't know what to do with us theologically, given our talk of gender equality and social justice. We are dipolomatic and pleasant enough but speak our minds. Now we may be exceptions that prove the sorting rule.
But here is my problem: historically, America has always had tribalistic mentalities but has, per Tocqueville, chosen to associate beyond the tribe for survival and for creativity's sake. The demographic deck is being shuffled. But despite the statistics of Chushing and Bishop, I don't see underlying significant associational dynamic differences between the 1950s and the 2000s. I see greater affluence and greater distraction which may affect the margins but not the center.
Blessings!
I think George points out something very important. Although he did not specifically say that he is living in a metropolitan area, I would bet that he is. Diversity is a given in these contexts.
Homogenous groups are not "unhealthy", nor or they necessarily unproductive. In fact, a unified focus on goal and purpose is "fodder" that brings about productivity, as it inspires.
So, what is the point in suggesting that diversity (bridging) is important? as an educational endeavor?
I think that it is also important to just as much leave some groups "alone", such as the Amish. Why should anyone think that "dissolving" their "world" makes their life better? Compared to what? Do we think that "our way of life" is "better"? If they are not bothering anyone, then why does anyone think that they need "help" (education)? I think that education "happens" as a result of "living". An open mind is important for a lesson to be learned "well". And an open mind is a matter of an individual's "will". Not all homogenous groups are open-minded.
"not all homogenous groups are open-minded" is an understatement, usually. As homogenity only affirms one's "world", as everyone "thinks or believes" that way...there is no challenge to the "world".
The danger is when "god" sanctions a "homogenous "world" at another's expense. Then one's will is engaged to be "closed minded" toward another's difference. Such is the case with fundamentally inclined faith traditions.
Just recently, I watched a documentary, Obsession, on radical Islam. Radicals which suppose that the Transcendent is the "only reality" are not reasonably based. Therefore, reason doesn't hold any influence in thier understanding of "life".
Obama's recent video to Iran was in one expert's opinion, going to be interpreted by the radicals as a "submission" of our nation's resolve or stand "for" democracy. The stakes will be higher for us, as we send this message, because the radicals will view us as weak (a disrepected position). I don't know the motivation that Obama had in sending this message, or his appeal to Russia for solidarity, at the expense of Poland's protection or his refusal of a Winston Churchill bust sent to us from Great Britian, but it seems that he is bent on re-orienting us in our "way of life". This is not diplomacy, but subservience.
George,
I think your experience offers a valid critique of sorting theory and I have great respect for your involvement in a church and community with ideas differing from your own. What I wonder after reading your response is if this sorting theory is a generational phenomenon. After college I moved to Boston. I chose a neighborhood with an apartment appropriate for my income level and made no effort to meet my neighbors. I hunted for a church that I felt comfortable in, and found it to be mostly a homogenous group, but not completely. Having moved several times since I still find myself connecting with groups with which I have some kind of base relationship, such as work friends or my church. Meeting neighbors is an awkward experience, and I'm a relatively extroverted person. I know very few people my age (I'm 25, by the way) who feel comfortable interacting with neighbors to build bridging relationships. We're more and more secluded and I feel like I and others I know are suspicious of anyone striking up a conversation in a public context.
http://theologypilgrim.wordpress.com
Dan,
Thanks for your thoughtful comments.
I think I might make a case either way for a generational "sorting," where "bridging" is more difficult. Because workers since the early 1970s has been radically rationalized and monetized, all of us, but especially the young who are trying to establish themselves, have less time outside of work and church for leisured social activity among strangers which is needed for "bridging." In addition, marketing and advertizing have created generational and subgenerational niches and pushed those niches down into even todlerdom. To put it another way, it may be harder for the younger generations to bridge because of time constraints and vocation. Consequently, the art of conversation with strangers suffers.
Blessings!
George,
That is a great point. I am experiencing that first hand. Between getting ready for work, commuting, and working, 12 hours of my day are committed to my job. It is currently one I'm not too fond of so at the end of the day I'm drained. The last thing I want to do is build briding relationships.
Having grown up in the 80s and 90s with parents that worked all the time, I want to create a better work-life balance for myself and my family. I think my generation is adamant about that balance across the board. Check out this article from the Wall Street Journal http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB122455219391652725-lMyQjAxMDI4MjA0NjUwNTYyWj.html
Dan
http://theologypilgrim.wordpress.com
Dan, I read the article and it is very biased. While I don't deny that for the most part this millienial generation had more than most generations in the past, to say that all of them are demanding is an over generalized statement.
Of course, personal experience is also limited, I am offended by such statements, as they do not represent "my reality" and those that I know personally.
All of my children were born during this stated period. And although from the outside, they would have seemed "spoiled", they were not, at least by American standards. My husband and I raised them with priviledge, yes, but also demanded responsibilty. All of our children had jobs in high school and at least paid part of their "special" requests, such as clothing that went above what we felt was appropriate. Should we have limited their choices in spending thier own money the way they wanted? No, I believe that teens learn from choices that sometimes are not very wise.
Even though we had certain ways of teaching our children certain responsibilities, our children's internalization played out differently within thier own perceptions. Our youngest is probabley the most "entitled", but we have seen him mature out of that attitude, at least partially.
Our daughter internalized our "demands" as criticisms of her "person" and so, has an overactive conscience, while our middle son has incorporated responsible attitudes about life.
How much of these "entitled" children are developed by innate character, parenting, position in the family unit, and other environmental factors? That is a hard one to gauge.
What we do know is that America has more than anyone else, in opportunity and material goods, so what have we done with it? I'm not sure, and I don't think that is necessarily a bad thing, as it underlines the freedom of the individual to choose. But, at the same time, it has hindered our responsible behavior to the "whole". This is why I think many youngsters "grow up" in the military, as it demands honor, duty, and country.