We started this series with a focus on spiritual warfare (Parts 1-3). But we ended up taking a theological detour in the middle posts when we recognized that a warfare theology required rethinking God's power in the world (Part 4). We did this by taking a cue from John Caputo's The Weakness of God where we posited that God's power in the world is manifested as weakness--as the power of the cross, as the power of love (Part 5). But while a focus on the weakness of God resolves some theodicy issues, it places some pressure on conventional readings of God's power in the biblical narrative, particularly how God's power relates to the origins of evil (Part 6) and to the ultimate defeat of evil (Part 7). Using a creation theology of the quotidian, we followed the Wisdom books and left those questions unresolved, focusing on the experience of spiritual struggle in the everyday (Part 8). Which brings us back to spiritual warfare.
So in the final two posts of this series we want to come back to the issue of spiritual warfare and Greg Boyd's God at War.
My argument is that progressive theology will be energized if it adopts a Christus Victor framework. Not only will this make progressive theology robustly more biblical, it infuses the spiritual experience with a sense of adventure and excitement. Two things that I think are critical if progressive theology wants to have broad popular appeal.
However, the Christus Victor framework is going to need to be recast if it is to be acceptable to progressive and liberal Christians. This was the issue we mentioned in Part 3, which we now return to.
Specifically, as regular readers know, Christus Victor theology views the salvific work of God as being primarily about our emancipation and liberation from dark enslaving forces. Biblically, these forces go by a variety of names--sin, death, Satan, the principalities and powers. In the book of Galatians Paul even describes "the Law" as an oppressive force.
You can run, at this point, in a variety of different directions in how you think about this spiritual conflict. Some might anthropomorphize these spiritual forces, positing literal demons and a literal Satan. And like I said in Part 3, that's fine if you want go in that direction. But many progressive and liberal Christians will struggle with this move. Does that mean progressives won't be able to work with a robust Christus Victor theology?
That's what it often looks like. It seems to be that progressives have been so spooked (pun alert) by the vision of a literal Satan and demons that they have rejected any hint of anything that smacked of "spiritual warfare." And this, in my estimation, is why progressive theology often looks so insipid, unexciting, and boring. In rejecting "spiritual warfare" progressive Christianity gave up on offering a vision of a "real fight."
This is not to say that progressive Christians gave up or lost a fighting spirit. Far, far from it. Progressive Christians are fighting everywhere, tooth and nail, for justice and peace. The problem, as I'm articulating it, is that this fight has been largely divorced from the biblical imagination. I think that is sad as the connections here are so obvious and rich.
For example, last night Jana attended an event at our church that was supporting the ministry of those fighting against sex trafficking in India. What is going on in the world of sex trafficking is truly demonic and satanic. Thus I think those working in these places of the world can be properly described as "exorcists," as agents of the Kingdom casting out devils. Just as Jesus did.
Because the problem of sex trafficking isn't just about "lust." It's about the spirituality of our age, a spirituality deeply entwined with nations and economies and politics and cultures and worldviews. A hurricane of dark forces that catch up and crush young women. How do you liberate those young women? How do you liberate a world caught up in the hurricane of that dark spirituality?
The battle against these dark forces is what Christus Victor theology is all about. Which is why I think progressive Christians would be energized in taking up the warfare theology of the New Testament. I think progressive Christians would benefit by being a bit more Pentecostal in this regard. Jesus commissioned his disciples to be exorcists. And I think progressive Christians need to start seeing themselves as so commissioned.
Dear progressive Christian, take a pass on Derrida, the micro-brews, the hipsterism. Be an exorcist. Start casting out devils.
Of course, such language is going to make a lot of progressives uneasy. But let me make a strange claim. I actually think, if progressive Christians started to think and talk this way, that they are well-positioned to help us better recover a more biblical notion of what spiritual warfare is supposed to look like.
Because if you look at the language in the bible regarding "the principalities and powers" you quickly see that these forces were often distributed and/or hierarchical forms of power. Yes, these were both spiritual and physical forms of power, but they were often conflated in ways that made them hard to separate. Caesar, for example, as a "son of God." Political power simply was an expression of spiritual power. And the point for our purposes is that the battle against "demons" is less about spooky spirits inhabiting human beings than in confronting the way the world works. I don't know if Adolf Hitler was literally demon possessed. But there was something demonic about how he was able to rise to power and do what he did. He couldn't have done it alone. The demonic forces at work in the rise of Nazism are not so easily localized. Nor are they in the fight against sex trafficking. Or in the battle against poverty.
In short, what is corrupted is, to use biblical language, "the present evil age." What is demonically infested is the way the world works.
And this is why I think progressives can help recover this biblical insight about the principalities and powers. Progressives have always focused on corrupt power arrangements and systems, on the way the world works. Thus, progressives are well-positioned help us see that "our battle is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Confronting the wickedness in high places is the proper work of spiritual warfare.
And let me make one final observation.
While it is true, as I've been arguing, that progressives can help us recover central aspects of spiritual warfare by focusing us on "wickedness in high places," I also think the paradigm of spiritual warfare can pull progressives toward a more holistic practice of Christianity. That is, I think the paradigm of spiritual warfare can help ameliorate some of the weaknesses of progressive Christianity.
Specifically, spiritual warfare can help up link up the political/structural
with the moral/personal. Generally, these spheres have been divided up
between liberal and conservative Christians, with liberal Christians
focusing on the political/structural and conservatives on the
moral/personal. But I think this divide can be bridged if progressives
adopt a spiritual warfare framework as it allows us to do battle with "the present evil age"--to become exorcists--at every level of the problem, from the personal on up to the
structural. For example, the battle against sex trafficking is both a
battle against lust (personal) and great structural evils. Same goes for
poverty. For progressives it's not just about famines in Africa and
global economic inequity. It's also about opening your home and life to
poor people.
In short, our battle against the principalities and powers is both political and pietistic.
Progressives have tended to be dismissive of piety, and yet some of
their greatest icons, from St. Francis to Gandhi to Mother Teresa to
Dorothy Day to Dietrich Bonhoeffer, were extraordinarily pietistic. And that piety is what gave their social witness such potency. And
this is, in my opinion, another part of the reason why progressive
theology has become insipid and uninteresting for many people. Liberal theology is intellectually stimulating, but holy lives connected to a social witness are what will attract people.
In short, there are devils to be cast out all over the place, from the personal to the structural. There is addiction and economic inequity, there is lust and sex trafficking, and there is forgiving each other seventy times seven and global peace-keeping.
So calling all exorcists. Progressive Christian...I'm looking at you.
Part 10
Email Subscription on Substack
Richard Beck
Welcome to the blog of Richard Beck, author and professor of psychology at Abilene Christian University (beckr@acu.edu).
The Theology of Faƫrie
The Little Way of St. ThĆ©rĆØse of Lisieux
The William Stringfellow Project (Ongoing)
Autobiographical Posts
- On Discoveries in Used Bookstores
- Two Brothers and Texas Rangers
- Visiting and Evolving in Monkey Town
- Roller Derby Girls
- A Life With Bibles
- Wearing a Crucifix
- Morning Prayer at San Buenaventura Mission
- The Halo of Overalls
- Less
- The Farmer's Market
- Subversion and Shame: I Like the Color Pink
- The Bureaucrat
- Uncle Richard, Vampire Hunter
- Palm Sunday with the Orthodox
- On Maps and Marital Spats
- Get on a Bike...and Go Slow
- Buying a Bible
- Memento Mori
- We Weren't as Good as the Muppets
- Uncle Richard and the Shark
- Growing Up Catholic
- Ghostbusting (Part 1)
- Ghostbusting (Part 2)
- My Eschatological Dog
- Tex Mex and Depression Era Cuisine
- Aliens at Roswell
On the Principalities and Powers
- Christ and the Powers
- Why I Talk about the Devil So Much
- The Preferential Option for the Poor
- The Political Theology of Les MisƩrables
- Good Enough
- On Anarchism and A**holes
- Christian Anarchism
- A Restless Patriotism
- Wink on Exorcism
- Images of God Against Empire
- A Boredom Revolution
- The Medal of St. Benedict
- Exorcisms are about Economics
- "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You?"
- "A Home for Demons...and the Merchants Weep"
- Tales of the Demonic
- The Ethic of Death: The Policies and Procedures Manual
- "All That Are Here Are Humans"
- Ears of Stone
- The War Prayer
- Letter from a Birmingham Jail
Experimental Theology
- Eucharistic Identity
- Tzimtzum, Cruciformity and Theodicy
- Holiness Among Depraved Christians: Paul's New Form of Moral Flourishing
- Empathic Open Theism
- The Victim Needs No Conversion
- The Hormonal God
- Covenantal Substitutionary Atonement
- The Satanic Church
- Mousetrap
- Easter Shouldn't Be Good News
- The Gospel According to Lady Gaga
- Your God is Too Big
From the Prison Bible Study
- The Philosopher
- God's Unconditional Love
- There is a Balm in Gilead
- In Prison With Ann Voskamp
- To Make the Love of God Credible
- Piss Christ in Prison
- Advent: A Prison Story
- Faithful in Little Things
- The Prayer of Jabez
- The Prayer of Willy Brown
- Those Old Time Gospel Songs
- I'll Fly Away
- Singing and Resistence
- Where the Gospel Matters
- Monday Night Bible Study (A Poem)
- Living in Babylon: Reading Revelation in Prison
- Reading the Beatitudes in Prision
- John 13: A Story from the Prision Study
- The Word
Series/Essays Based on my Research
The Theology of Calvin and Hobbes
The Theology of Peanuts
The Snake Handling Churches of Appalachia
Eccentric Christianity
- Part 1: A Peculiar People
- Part 2: The Eccentric God, Transcendence and the Prophetic Imagination
- Part 3: Welcoming God in the Stranger
- Part 4: Enchantment, the Porous Self and the Spirit
- Part 5: Doubt, Gratitude and an Eccentric Faith
- Part 6: The Eccentric Economy of Love
- Part 7: The Eccentric Kingdom
The Fuller Integration Lectures
Blogging about the Bible
- Unicorns in the Bible
- "Let My People Go!": On Worship, Work and Laziness
- The True Troubler
- Stumbling At Just One Point
- The Faith of Demons
- The Lord Saw That She Was Not Loved
- The Subversion of the Creator God
- Hell On Earth: The Church as the Baptism of Fire and the Holy Spirit
- The Things That Make for Peace
- The Lord of the Flies
- On Preterism, the Second Coming and Hell
- Commitment and Violence: A Reading of the Akedah
- Gain Versus Gift in Ecclesiastes
- Redemption and the Goel
- The Psalms as Liberation Theology
- Control Your Vessel
- Circumcised Ears
- Forgive Us Our Trespasses
- Doing Beautiful Things
- The Most Remarkable Sequence in the Bible
- Targeting the Dove Sellers
- Christus Victor in Galatians
- Devoted to Destruction: Reading Cherem Non-Violently
- The Triumph of the Cross
- The Threshing Floor of Araunah
- Hold Others Above Yourself
- Blessed are the Tricksters
- Adam's First Wife
- I Am a Worm
- Christus Victor in the Lord's Prayer
- Let Them Both Grow Together
- Repent
- Here I Am
- Becoming the Jubilee
- Sermon on the Mount: Study Guide
- Treat Them as a Pagan or Tax Collector
- Going Outside the Camp
- Welcoming Children
- The Song of Lamech and the Song of the Lamb
- The Nephilim
- Shaming Jesus
- Pseudepigrapha and the Christian Witness
- The Exclusion and Inclusion of Eunuchs
- The Second Moses
- The New Manna
- Salvation in the First Sermons of the Church
- "A Bloody Husband"
- Song of the Vineyard
Bonhoeffer's Letters from Prision
Civil Rights History and Race Relations
- The Gospel According to Ta-Nehisi Coates (Six Part Series)
- Bus Ride to Justice: Toward Racial Reconciliation in the Churches of Christ
- Black Heroism and White Sympathy: A Reflection on the Charleston Shooting
- Selma 50th Anniversary
- More Than Three Minutes
- The Passion of White America
- Remembering James Chaney, Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman
- Will Campbell
- Sitting in the Pews of Ebeneser Baptist Church
- MLK Bedtime Prayer
- Freedom Rider
- Mountiantop
- Freedom Summer
- Civil Rights Family Trip 1: Memphis
- Civil Rights Family Trip 2: Atlanta
- Civil Rights Family Trip 3: Birmingham
- Civil Rights Family Trip 4: Selma
- Civil Rights Family Trip 5: Montgomery
Hip Christianity
The Charism of the Charismatics
Would Jesus Break a Window?: The Hermeneutics of the Temple Action
Being Church
- Instead of a Coffee Shop How About a Laundromat?
- A Million Boring Little Things
- A Prayer for ISIS
- "The People At Our Church Die A Lot"
- The Angel of Freedom
- Washing Dishes at Freedom Fellowship
- Where David Plays the Tambourine
- On Interruptibility
- Mattering
- This Ritual of Hallowing
- Faith as Honoring
- The Beautiful
- The Sensory Boundary
- The Missional and Apostolic Nature of Holiness
- Open Commuion: Warning!
- The Impurity of Love
- A Community Called Forgiveness
- Love is the Allocation of Our Dying
- Freedom Fellowship
- Wednesday Night Church
- The Hands of Christ
- Barbara, Stanley and Andrea: Thoughts on Love, Training and Social Psychology
- Gerald's Gift
- Wiping the Blood Away
- This Morning Jesus Put On Dark Sunglasses
- The Only Way I Know How to Save the World
- Renunciation
- The Reason We Gather
- Anointing With Oil
- Incarnations of God's Mercy
Exploring Preterism
Scripture and Discernment
- Owning Your Protestantism: We Follow Our Conscience, Not the Bible
- Emotional Intelligence and Sola Scriptura
- Songbooks vs. the Psalms
- Biblical as Sociological Stress Test
- Cookie Cutting the Bible: A Case Study
- Pawn to King 4
- Allowing God to Rage
- Poetry of a Murderer
- On Christian Communion: Killing vs. Sexuality
- Heretics and Disagreement
- Atonement: A Primer
- "The Bible says..."
- The "Yes, but..." Church
- Human Experience and the Bible
- Discernment, Part 1
- Discernment, Part 2
- Rabbinic Hedges
- Fuzzy Logic
Interacting with Good Books
- Christian Political Witness
- The Road
- Powers and Submissions
- City of God
- Playing God
- Torture and Eucharist
- How Much is Enough?
- From Willow Creek to Sacred Heart
- The Catonsville Nine
- Daring Greatly
- On Job (GutiƩrrez)
- The Selfless Way of Christ
- World Upside Down
- Are Christians Hate-Filled Hypocrites?
- Christ and Horrors
- The King Jesus Gospel
- Insurrection
- The Bible Made Impossible
- The Deliverance of God
- To Change the World
- Sexuality and the Christian Body
- I Told Me So
- The Teaching of the Twelve
- Evolving in Monkey Town
- Saved from Sacrifice: A Series
- Darwin's Sacred Cause
- Outliers
- A Secular Age
- The God Who Risks
Moral Psychology
- The Dark Spell the Devil Casts: Refugees and Our Slavery to the Fear of Death
- Philia Over Phobia
- Elizabeth Smart and the Psychology of the Christian Purity Culture
- On Love and the Yuck Factor
- Ethnocentrism and Politics
- Flies, Attention and Morality
- The Banality of Evil
- The Ovens at Buchenwald
- Violence and Traffic Lights
- Defending Individualism
- Guilt and Atonement
- The Varieties of Love and Hate
- The Wicked
- Moral Foundations
- Primum non nocere
- The Moral Emotions
- The Moral Circle, Part 1
- The Moral Circle, Part 2
- Taboo Psychology
- The Morality of Mentality
- Moral Conviction
- Infrahumanization
- Holiness and Moral Grammars
The Purity Psychology of Progressive Christianity
The Theology of Everyday Life
- Self-Esteem Through Shaming
- Let Us Be the Heart Of the Church Rather Than the Amygdala
- Online Debates and Stages of Change
- The Devil on a Wiffle Ball Field
- Incarnational Theology and Mental Illness
- Social Media as Sacrament
- The Impossibility of Calvinistic Psychotherapy
- Hating Pixels
- Dress, Divinity and Dumbfounding
- The Kingdom of God Will Not Be Tweeted
- Tattoos
- The Ethics of :-)
- On Snobbery
- Jokes
- Hypocrisy
- Everything I learned about life I learned coaching tee-ball
- Gossip, Part 1: The Food of the Brain
- Gossip, Part 2: Evolutionary Stable Strategies
- Gossip, Part 3: The Pay it Forward World
- Human Nature
- Welcome
- On Humility
Jesus, You're Making Me Tired: Scarcity and Spiritual Formation
A Progressive Vision of the Benedict Option
George MacDonald
Jesus & the Jolly Roger: The Kingdom of God is Like a Pirate
Alone, Suburban & Sorted
The Theology of Monsters
The Theology of Ugly
Orthodox Iconography
Musings On Faith, Belief, and Doubt
- The Meanings Only Faith Can Reveal
- Pragmatism and Progressive Christianity
- Doubt and Cognitive Rumination
- A/theism and the Transcendent
- Kingdom A/theism
- The Ontological Argument
- Cheap Praise and Costly Praise
- god
- Wired to Suffer
- A New Apologetics
- Orthodox Alexithymia
- High and Low: The Psalms and Suffering
- The Buddhist Phase
- Skilled Christianity
- The Two Families of God
- The Bait and Switch of Contemporary Christianity
- Theodicy and No Country for Old Men
- Doubt: A Diagnosis
- Faith and Modernity
- Faith after "The Cognitive Turn"
- Salvation
- The Gifts of Doubt
- A Beautiful Life
- Is Santa Claus Real?
- The Feeling of Knowing
- Practicing Christianity
- In Praise of Doubt
- Skepticism and Conviction
- Pragmatic Belief
- N-Order Complaint and Need for Cognition
Holiday Musings
- Everything I Learned about Christmas I Learned from TV
- Advent: Learning to Wait
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 1
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 2
- It's Still Christmas
- Easter Shouldn't Be Good News
- The Deeper Magic: A Good Friday Meditation
- Palm Sunday with the Orthodox
- Growing Up Catholic: A Lenten Meditation
- The Liturgical Year for Dummies
- "Watching Their Flocks at Night": An Advent Meditation
- Pentecost and Babel
- Epiphany
- Ambivalence about Lent
- On Easter and Astronomy
- Sex Sandals and Advent
- Freud and Valentine's Day
- Existentialism and Halloween
- Halloween Redux: Talking with the Dead
The Offbeat
- Batman and the Joker
- The Theology of Ugly Dolls
- Jesus Would Be a Hufflepuff
- The Moral Example of Captain Jack Sparrow
- Weddings Real, Imagined and Yet to Come
- Michelangelo and Neuroanatomy
- Believing in Bigfoot
- The Kingdom of God as Improv and Flash Mob
- 2012 and the End of the World
- The Polar Express and the Uncanny Valley
- Why the Anti-Christ Is an Idiot
- On Harry Potter and Vampire Movies
As I see it, the biggest peril of a Christus Victor language is that it lends itself to Christian triumphalism and the warfare metaphor, however well-meaning and 'redefined,' suggests the vanquishing of all other modes of religious thought. Sorry, I don't think our culture or Christianity needs more warfare metaphors or framing to be engaging and exciting. In fact, I think the notion that casting things in terms of warfare (us. v. them) will make it more appealing is part of the problem.
I can see where you're coming from, but isn't there a BIG distinction between battling against other people and battling against that which oppresses other people? Christian triumphalism and what Richard is talking about here are entirely opposite. There is no "us" and "them," we are all one in Christ, and battle together against all that Christ is not.
I don't know about you, but I don't see how my struggle to be Christ-like every day can be anything but a war, though as this series has shown, it is a war won when I am unified into the great strength of Christ's weakness.
Wow. This is spectacular.
One aspect I don't believe you have discussed in this series is the difficulty of distinguishing spiritual enemies and spiritual allies. That is, angels and demons (however conceived) work by the same means. Eve thought the serpent was an ally. "Lust" is the other side of "Eros", a legitimate component of marital love. The knock on Derrida suggests to me that you are thinking that spiritual warfare will involve _recognizing_ the evil quality of the enemy, but I am afraid that the attempt to do that inevitably leads to quibbling in the swamp ... the Serpent asks, "Is that _really_ what God said? Is prostitution _always_ an evil to be eradicated? Come, let us reason together." Whereas it seems to me that demons must be exorcised individually and locally. Not by launching against the Armies of Darkness, which (corrallary of Theory of Weakness) empowers them through collateral damage, but if at all by hand-to-hand combat, a specific somewhat arbitrary commitment made from within a situation . Just because things really are relative doesn't excuse.
The other problem I have with "Christus Victor" is the implication that Christ has already won. But if it's a real fight (and particularly if the angels and the demons are known to change colors), then we don't know how it turns out. Not just real excitement, also real fear.
... reading this over, just want to say yes, agree, people (eg, me) need to be making (more) such commitments, in the face of fear/defensiveness/laziness/cheapitivity/frustration/etc. Christianity is hard work.
Good comment man. It is very easy to say "I'm against EVIL!" But much more difficult to specifically say what it is that is evil.
Ecclesiastes 3:1-12
Chapter 3
A Time for Everything
For everything there is a season, and a time for every matter under heaven:
a time to be born, and a time to die;
a time to plant, and a time to pluck up what is planted;
a time to kill, and a time to heal;
a time to break down, and a time to build up;
a time to weep, and a time to laugh;
a time to mourn, and a time to dance;
a time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together;
a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing;
a time to seek, and a time to lose;
a time to keep, and a time to cast away;
a time to tear, and a time to sew;
a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;
a time to love, and a time to hate;
a time for war, and a time for peace.
The God- Given Task
What gain has the worker from his toil? I have seen the business that God has given to the children of man to be busy with. He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, he has put eternity into man's heart, yet so that he cannot find out what God has done from the beginning to the end. I perceived that there is nothing better for them than to be joyful and to do good as long as they live;
“Not only will this make progressive theology robustly more biblical, it infuses the spiritual
experience with a sense of adventure and excitement.”
Wow! Exorcism with “Adventure
and Excitement” – Sounds Cool!
There is BAD cultural relativism ... you've got to go along to get along ... and in certain circles this was its anthem. There's a great plenty of keeping silent, breaking down, and killing going around. Rather, discrimination, choice, commitment. "Preserve me from the enemy who has something to gain: and/from the friend who has something to lose./Remembering the words of Nehemiah the Prophet: 'The trowel/ in hand, and the gun rather loose in the holster.' " -T.S. Eliot, Choruses from the Rock
I totally agree, insofar as you are saying that you want to ensure that any inclusion of angelic language and warfare language shouldn't lead to a "spiritualization" of struggle, meaning a turning of material and practical struggle into "just praying about it." I think Richard, Boyd, Wink et al would totally agree with this; in that sense, I think a recovery of the angelic language as quotidian language is essential to an accurate reading of Scripture. Here, the process of recovery is meant to lead us, precisely, to things like voting and bandaging the wounds of people, based on the claim that this was the ancient understanding of spiritual language. The problem, on this reading, is not the ancient concepts, but the modern (really, Enlightenment) turn that internalized all transcendent language. In light of this, it becomes clear that what you are considering conservative is, in fact, novel (and wrong), and that what you are considering non-conservative is actually the position that conserves and recovers the tradition. I'm much more comfortable with what Richard is doing here, because I have all of that in mind. He's not calling for anything like the canonization of Frank Pareti, or for Pentacostalism gone wild; in fact, the folks he is drawing on provide a major corrective to all of that stuff, and reclaim the Biblical heritage from people who have not understood it or applied it properly. So I think, in the context of the blog and the conversation, precisely those dangers have been pretty thoroughly addressed...I think that's what makes this project so interesting.
Glad we agree on some points. I don’t think Richard or Boyd do though. What I have read of them always leads to the answer being in Christ, not in any action or anything tangible. I might be missing what you mean by “internalized
all transcendent language”. That should be a GOOD process, of making the language part of our wisdom, you make it sound bad. The remainder of what you have to say are just claims that Richard is on the right track. I think we
agree that the arc of history is toward justice, but your claims that Biblical or spiritual language supports that movement needs a lot more backup.
While I'm not sure that is what they are saying, I'd go at it this way. Saying "the answer is in Christ" must be understood as something actionable and tangible, or it has not been understood. The fact that it appears to be anything else is a product of transcendent language being internalized...i.e., spiritual language (like, the answer is in Christ) is taken to refer simply to an internal, personal, psychological process, rather than an external, interpersonal, historical process. Among the writers being referenced here, N.T. Wright, in particular, makes the point the most strongly that to refer to Christ is, necessarily, to refer to real, visible, activity and real historical processes. The Enlightenment and a fair amount of Protestant theology are, I think, at the core of this internalization, which makes it possible to contrast "being in Christ" with "action," as if "being in Christ" didn't entail action (such as caring for the poor and engaging in effective political advocacy). Regardless of what you think of the goodness or badness of that Enlightenment shift, as a purely descriptive matter, it causes contemporary people to read Christian scripture in a way that gives it meanings that are dramatically different than the meanings that would have been ascribed to it by normal readers at the time they were written.
I don’t separate these forces the way you do. We are
products of our culture and our internal processes. Christ said and did
whatever he did and people interpreted that and some of that interpretation has
been lost in translation and time. You can’t possibly know how it was taken at
the time it was written. I need no more evidence than the myriad definitions of
“sin” that are out there now. If Christian teaching always led to caring actions,
then we wouldn’t even be discussing this, but we know that is not true.
I don’t think spiritual language is either purely
psychological or part of a historical process. It’s symbolic. The problem is
the same symbol is used to mean vastly different things. I suspect you and I
would agree on most concrete actions needed to make the world better today, but
you and someone from your own church would probably have disagreements about
who Christ was or what Romans 13:8 means.
Adopting the language of "spiritual warfare" will also help progressives be Christians WITH the poor and non-Western believers that they now only minister TO, as these Christians are often drawn to or more culturally familiar with the charismatic.
I'm glad you don't separate them in that way; I don't either. At any rate, if you don't separate them, then this sentence should sound incoherent to you: "What I have read of them always leads to the answer being in Christ, not in any action or anything tangible." It should sound incoherent in the same way that it would be incoherent to say this: "He just wants to go for a run, but never wants to get any exercise." I'm pretty confident that Richard Beck and Greg Boyd are on the same page with you, then, in considering both statements incoherent. And I'm pretty confident the New Testament authors were as well. It's true that we don't know anything with absolute certainty, but I actually think these kinds of matters can be determined to a relatively high degree of confidence.
Now on the symbolic nature of religious language: on this, we are also in agreement. That is great :) I'd add that it is a feature of all language. Language is a symbolic system. Even at its most precise, scientific language is also still part of a symbolic system; even the very best map is not the same thing as the territory.
One often neglected area of spiritual warfare is "The Spiritual Ambush." See how a U.S. Army Ranger took what he learned about dealing with ambushes in the physical jungle and applied it to the spiritual jungle at www.spiritualjungle.org.
This is very essential blog; it helped me a lot whatever
you have provided.
click
over here now