In this post we begin to discuss sociologist Ray Oldenburg's book The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community.
Oldenburg begins The Great Good Place with a few quotes. I'd like to share two of them to start us off:
But aside from friends, there must also be a Place. I suppose that this is the Great Good Place that every man carries in his heart...
--Pete Hamill
A community life exists when one can go daily to a given location at a given time and see many of the people one knows.
--Philip Slater
Oldenburg begins his book by discussing the Problem of Place in America today. The Problem of Place is the result of rapid changes that have occurred in American living arrangements after World War II. Specifically, after WWII America witnessed the rise of the automotive suburb. War veterans, seeking a peaceful existence, began to seek out quiet enclaves, a patch of grass and a cul de sac. Although there is nothing wrong with quiet neighborhoods, many things were sacrificed in how Americans built their suburbs. Specifically, the following places began to vanish from American lives:
Pedestrian-heavy sidewalks on Main Street
Main Street hangouts (barbershops, soda fountains, diners)
The front porch (the back porch with a fenced in backyard predominates in suburbs)
Corner stores
Corner taverns and pubs
Local parks
According to Oldenburg, the loss of these places have dramatically affected American community. Without places to mix, converse, and connect American social life has grown thin. And it's mainly a problem of place. We've lost the locations where social connections are made and maintained. Why did Americans trade in vibrant communities for quiet suburbs? Oldenburg gives Dolores Hayden's answer: Americans have "substituted the vision of the ideal home for that of the ideal city."
With the loss of these places Americans have been reduced to commuting between two locations: Home and work. A person leaves home in the morning and heads to work. After work we drive back home. Thus, Americans are largely reduced to living in two places. But for a fuller social existence Oldenburg argues that we need a "third place" in our lives. Oldenburg notes that all vibrant communities have third places, places other than home or work, where community and fellowship can be found. In America it was the shops, parks, soda fountains, diners, barbershops and taverns along Main Street. In England it is the local pub. In France it is the coffeehouse. In Germany, the beer garden. Europe has largely kept its third places while Americans have gradually lost theirs. Thus, many Europeans struggle with living in American suburbs. One can't take a quick walk around the corner to grab a pint and chat up the gang about news and events. Of course, one can drive somewhere to get a pint but it's hard to build up a regular clientele if people have to drive miles to get to the establishment. Thus, many Americans might go to pubs or coffee shops but they tend to do so sporadically and often alone. As a consequence, very little social mixing occurs.
Oldenburg summarizes:
"A two-stop model of daily routine is becoming fixed in our habits as the urban environment affords less opportunity for public relaxation. Our familiar gathering centers are disappearing rapidly...The new kinds of places emphasize fast service, not slow and easy relaxation.
In the absence of an informal public life, people's expectations toward work and family life have escalated beyond the capacity of those institutions to meet them. Domestic and work relationships are pressed to supply all that is wanting and much that is missing in the constricted life-styles of those without community." (p. 9)
"The problem of place in America manifests itself in a sorely deficient informal public life. The structure of shared experience beyond what is offered by family, job, and passive consumerism is small and dwindling. The essential group experience is being replaced by the exaggerated self-consciousness of individuals. American life-styles, for all their material acquisition and the seeking after comforts and pleasures, are plagued by boredom, loneliness, alienation, and a high price tag. America can point to many areas where she has made progress, but in the area of informal public life she has lost ground and continues to lose it." (p. 13)
"The examples set by societies that have solved the problem of place and those set by the small towns and vital neighborhoods of our past suggest that daily life, in order to be relaxed and fulfilling, must find its balance in three realms of experience. One is domestic, a second is gainful and productive, and the third is inclusively sociable, offering both the basis of community and the celebration of it. Each of these realms of experience is built on associations and relationships appropriate to it; each has its own physically separate and distinct places; each must have its measure of autonomy from the others...In the the United States, the middle classes particularly are attempting a balancing act on a bipod consisting of home and work. That alienation, boredom, and stress are endemic among us is not surprising. For most of us, a third of life is either deficient or absent altogether, and the other two-thirds cannot be successfully integrated into a whole." (p. 14, 15)
"For want of a suitable existing term, we introduce our own: the third place will hereafter be used to signify what we have called 'the core settings of informal public life.' The third place is a generic designation for a great variety of public places that host the regular, voluntary, informal, and happily anticipated gatherings of individuals beyond the realms of home and work...[The term] underscores the significance of the tripod and the relative importance of its three legs." (p. 16)
I want to dwell on third places as these observations converge upon the trends noted in the earlier posts. That is, Americans are socially disengaged, sorted into communities of like-mindedness, and have largely lost their third places. But I also wanted to end this series with the third place as I think the third place might allow us to reverse or mitigate some of the trends we have been discussing. If third places can be cultivated, if the Problem of Place is addressed, much of what we have been discussing (disengagement, sorted communities) might be overcome (locally and to some small degree). If so, then it is worth the effort to explore the characteristics of third places in a little more detail.
Final Post: Where Everybody Knows Your Name
Email Subscription on Substack
Richard Beck
Welcome to the blog of Richard Beck, author and professor of psychology at Abilene Christian University (beckr@acu.edu).
The Theology of Faƫrie
The Little Way of St. ThĆ©rĆØse of Lisieux
The William Stringfellow Project (Ongoing)
Autobiographical Posts
- On Discoveries in Used Bookstores
- Two Brothers and Texas Rangers
- Visiting and Evolving in Monkey Town
- Roller Derby Girls
- A Life With Bibles
- Wearing a Crucifix
- Morning Prayer at San Buenaventura Mission
- The Halo of Overalls
- Less
- The Farmer's Market
- Subversion and Shame: I Like the Color Pink
- The Bureaucrat
- Uncle Richard, Vampire Hunter
- Palm Sunday with the Orthodox
- On Maps and Marital Spats
- Get on a Bike...and Go Slow
- Buying a Bible
- Memento Mori
- We Weren't as Good as the Muppets
- Uncle Richard and the Shark
- Growing Up Catholic
- Ghostbusting (Part 1)
- Ghostbusting (Part 2)
- My Eschatological Dog
- Tex Mex and Depression Era Cuisine
- Aliens at Roswell
On the Principalities and Powers
- Christ and the Powers
- Why I Talk about the Devil So Much
- The Preferential Option for the Poor
- The Political Theology of Les MisƩrables
- Good Enough
- On Anarchism and A**holes
- Christian Anarchism
- A Restless Patriotism
- Wink on Exorcism
- Images of God Against Empire
- A Boredom Revolution
- The Medal of St. Benedict
- Exorcisms are about Economics
- "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You?"
- "A Home for Demons...and the Merchants Weep"
- Tales of the Demonic
- The Ethic of Death: The Policies and Procedures Manual
- "All That Are Here Are Humans"
- Ears of Stone
- The War Prayer
- Letter from a Birmingham Jail
Experimental Theology
- Eucharistic Identity
- Tzimtzum, Cruciformity and Theodicy
- Holiness Among Depraved Christians: Paul's New Form of Moral Flourishing
- Empathic Open Theism
- The Victim Needs No Conversion
- The Hormonal God
- Covenantal Substitutionary Atonement
- The Satanic Church
- Mousetrap
- Easter Shouldn't Be Good News
- The Gospel According to Lady Gaga
- Your God is Too Big
From the Prison Bible Study
- The Philosopher
- God's Unconditional Love
- There is a Balm in Gilead
- In Prison With Ann Voskamp
- To Make the Love of God Credible
- Piss Christ in Prison
- Advent: A Prison Story
- Faithful in Little Things
- The Prayer of Jabez
- The Prayer of Willy Brown
- Those Old Time Gospel Songs
- I'll Fly Away
- Singing and Resistence
- Where the Gospel Matters
- Monday Night Bible Study (A Poem)
- Living in Babylon: Reading Revelation in Prison
- Reading the Beatitudes in Prision
- John 13: A Story from the Prision Study
- The Word
Series/Essays Based on my Research
The Theology of Calvin and Hobbes
The Theology of Peanuts
The Snake Handling Churches of Appalachia
Eccentric Christianity
- Part 1: A Peculiar People
- Part 2: The Eccentric God, Transcendence and the Prophetic Imagination
- Part 3: Welcoming God in the Stranger
- Part 4: Enchantment, the Porous Self and the Spirit
- Part 5: Doubt, Gratitude and an Eccentric Faith
- Part 6: The Eccentric Economy of Love
- Part 7: The Eccentric Kingdom
The Fuller Integration Lectures
Blogging about the Bible
- Unicorns in the Bible
- "Let My People Go!": On Worship, Work and Laziness
- The True Troubler
- Stumbling At Just One Point
- The Faith of Demons
- The Lord Saw That She Was Not Loved
- The Subversion of the Creator God
- Hell On Earth: The Church as the Baptism of Fire and the Holy Spirit
- The Things That Make for Peace
- The Lord of the Flies
- On Preterism, the Second Coming and Hell
- Commitment and Violence: A Reading of the Akedah
- Gain Versus Gift in Ecclesiastes
- Redemption and the Goel
- The Psalms as Liberation Theology
- Control Your Vessel
- Circumcised Ears
- Forgive Us Our Trespasses
- Doing Beautiful Things
- The Most Remarkable Sequence in the Bible
- Targeting the Dove Sellers
- Christus Victor in Galatians
- Devoted to Destruction: Reading Cherem Non-Violently
- The Triumph of the Cross
- The Threshing Floor of Araunah
- Hold Others Above Yourself
- Blessed are the Tricksters
- Adam's First Wife
- I Am a Worm
- Christus Victor in the Lord's Prayer
- Let Them Both Grow Together
- Repent
- Here I Am
- Becoming the Jubilee
- Sermon on the Mount: Study Guide
- Treat Them as a Pagan or Tax Collector
- Going Outside the Camp
- Welcoming Children
- The Song of Lamech and the Song of the Lamb
- The Nephilim
- Shaming Jesus
- Pseudepigrapha and the Christian Witness
- The Exclusion and Inclusion of Eunuchs
- The Second Moses
- The New Manna
- Salvation in the First Sermons of the Church
- "A Bloody Husband"
- Song of the Vineyard
Bonhoeffer's Letters from Prision
Civil Rights History and Race Relations
- The Gospel According to Ta-Nehisi Coates (Six Part Series)
- Bus Ride to Justice: Toward Racial Reconciliation in the Churches of Christ
- Black Heroism and White Sympathy: A Reflection on the Charleston Shooting
- Selma 50th Anniversary
- More Than Three Minutes
- The Passion of White America
- Remembering James Chaney, Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman
- Will Campbell
- Sitting in the Pews of Ebeneser Baptist Church
- MLK Bedtime Prayer
- Freedom Rider
- Mountiantop
- Freedom Summer
- Civil Rights Family Trip 1: Memphis
- Civil Rights Family Trip 2: Atlanta
- Civil Rights Family Trip 3: Birmingham
- Civil Rights Family Trip 4: Selma
- Civil Rights Family Trip 5: Montgomery
Hip Christianity
The Charism of the Charismatics
Would Jesus Break a Window?: The Hermeneutics of the Temple Action
Being Church
- Instead of a Coffee Shop How About a Laundromat?
- A Million Boring Little Things
- A Prayer for ISIS
- "The People At Our Church Die A Lot"
- The Angel of Freedom
- Washing Dishes at Freedom Fellowship
- Where David Plays the Tambourine
- On Interruptibility
- Mattering
- This Ritual of Hallowing
- Faith as Honoring
- The Beautiful
- The Sensory Boundary
- The Missional and Apostolic Nature of Holiness
- Open Commuion: Warning!
- The Impurity of Love
- A Community Called Forgiveness
- Love is the Allocation of Our Dying
- Freedom Fellowship
- Wednesday Night Church
- The Hands of Christ
- Barbara, Stanley and Andrea: Thoughts on Love, Training and Social Psychology
- Gerald's Gift
- Wiping the Blood Away
- This Morning Jesus Put On Dark Sunglasses
- The Only Way I Know How to Save the World
- Renunciation
- The Reason We Gather
- Anointing With Oil
- Incarnations of God's Mercy
Exploring Preterism
Scripture and Discernment
- Owning Your Protestantism: We Follow Our Conscience, Not the Bible
- Emotional Intelligence and Sola Scriptura
- Songbooks vs. the Psalms
- Biblical as Sociological Stress Test
- Cookie Cutting the Bible: A Case Study
- Pawn to King 4
- Allowing God to Rage
- Poetry of a Murderer
- On Christian Communion: Killing vs. Sexuality
- Heretics and Disagreement
- Atonement: A Primer
- "The Bible says..."
- The "Yes, but..." Church
- Human Experience and the Bible
- Discernment, Part 1
- Discernment, Part 2
- Rabbinic Hedges
- Fuzzy Logic
Interacting with Good Books
- Christian Political Witness
- The Road
- Powers and Submissions
- City of God
- Playing God
- Torture and Eucharist
- How Much is Enough?
- From Willow Creek to Sacred Heart
- The Catonsville Nine
- Daring Greatly
- On Job (GutiƩrrez)
- The Selfless Way of Christ
- World Upside Down
- Are Christians Hate-Filled Hypocrites?
- Christ and Horrors
- The King Jesus Gospel
- Insurrection
- The Bible Made Impossible
- The Deliverance of God
- To Change the World
- Sexuality and the Christian Body
- I Told Me So
- The Teaching of the Twelve
- Evolving in Monkey Town
- Saved from Sacrifice: A Series
- Darwin's Sacred Cause
- Outliers
- A Secular Age
- The God Who Risks
Moral Psychology
- The Dark Spell the Devil Casts: Refugees and Our Slavery to the Fear of Death
- Philia Over Phobia
- Elizabeth Smart and the Psychology of the Christian Purity Culture
- On Love and the Yuck Factor
- Ethnocentrism and Politics
- Flies, Attention and Morality
- The Banality of Evil
- The Ovens at Buchenwald
- Violence and Traffic Lights
- Defending Individualism
- Guilt and Atonement
- The Varieties of Love and Hate
- The Wicked
- Moral Foundations
- Primum non nocere
- The Moral Emotions
- The Moral Circle, Part 1
- The Moral Circle, Part 2
- Taboo Psychology
- The Morality of Mentality
- Moral Conviction
- Infrahumanization
- Holiness and Moral Grammars
The Purity Psychology of Progressive Christianity
The Theology of Everyday Life
- Self-Esteem Through Shaming
- Let Us Be the Heart Of the Church Rather Than the Amygdala
- Online Debates and Stages of Change
- The Devil on a Wiffle Ball Field
- Incarnational Theology and Mental Illness
- Social Media as Sacrament
- The Impossibility of Calvinistic Psychotherapy
- Hating Pixels
- Dress, Divinity and Dumbfounding
- The Kingdom of God Will Not Be Tweeted
- Tattoos
- The Ethics of :-)
- On Snobbery
- Jokes
- Hypocrisy
- Everything I learned about life I learned coaching tee-ball
- Gossip, Part 1: The Food of the Brain
- Gossip, Part 2: Evolutionary Stable Strategies
- Gossip, Part 3: The Pay it Forward World
- Human Nature
- Welcome
- On Humility
Jesus, You're Making Me Tired: Scarcity and Spiritual Formation
A Progressive Vision of the Benedict Option
George MacDonald
Jesus & the Jolly Roger: The Kingdom of God is Like a Pirate
Alone, Suburban & Sorted
The Theology of Monsters
The Theology of Ugly
Orthodox Iconography
Musings On Faith, Belief, and Doubt
- The Meanings Only Faith Can Reveal
- Pragmatism and Progressive Christianity
- Doubt and Cognitive Rumination
- A/theism and the Transcendent
- Kingdom A/theism
- The Ontological Argument
- Cheap Praise and Costly Praise
- god
- Wired to Suffer
- A New Apologetics
- Orthodox Alexithymia
- High and Low: The Psalms and Suffering
- The Buddhist Phase
- Skilled Christianity
- The Two Families of God
- The Bait and Switch of Contemporary Christianity
- Theodicy and No Country for Old Men
- Doubt: A Diagnosis
- Faith and Modernity
- Faith after "The Cognitive Turn"
- Salvation
- The Gifts of Doubt
- A Beautiful Life
- Is Santa Claus Real?
- The Feeling of Knowing
- Practicing Christianity
- In Praise of Doubt
- Skepticism and Conviction
- Pragmatic Belief
- N-Order Complaint and Need for Cognition
Holiday Musings
- Everything I Learned about Christmas I Learned from TV
- Advent: Learning to Wait
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 1
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 2
- It's Still Christmas
- Easter Shouldn't Be Good News
- The Deeper Magic: A Good Friday Meditation
- Palm Sunday with the Orthodox
- Growing Up Catholic: A Lenten Meditation
- The Liturgical Year for Dummies
- "Watching Their Flocks at Night": An Advent Meditation
- Pentecost and Babel
- Epiphany
- Ambivalence about Lent
- On Easter and Astronomy
- Sex Sandals and Advent
- Freud and Valentine's Day
- Existentialism and Halloween
- Halloween Redux: Talking with the Dead
The Offbeat
- Batman and the Joker
- The Theology of Ugly Dolls
- Jesus Would Be a Hufflepuff
- The Moral Example of Captain Jack Sparrow
- Weddings Real, Imagined and Yet to Come
- Michelangelo and Neuroanatomy
- Believing in Bigfoot
- The Kingdom of God as Improv and Flash Mob
- 2012 and the End of the World
- The Polar Express and the Uncanny Valley
- Why the Anti-Christ Is an Idiot
- On Harry Potter and Vampire Movies
To some, the locale of sporting events might represent a 3rd place. The university football stadium here seats 100,000+ and attendance seems almost a religious ritual. Owing to their higher frequency, professional sporting event facilities may also function similarly. That is a guess. I've never lived in such a city but it seems possible that for many people they are 3rd places.
I have a question as to how you are critiquing the American way of life, as you obviously think that work or the domestic realm does not meet some "standard" of an "ideal". What is that "standard" and where does that "ideal" come from? I am imagning that your "ideal" somewhat has diversity as its standard, but why is this important to you?
Secondly, what is the primary concern about this situaion, as it concerns, human flourishing?
Hey Richard
I don't have much to say in the way of thoughtful comments, but I do want to put out a related story.
Given that I am working on my dissertation now close to 100% of the time, added to that the fact that my office at WashU is windowless, I tend to do a lot of my work at coffee shops. One of my coffee local shops is a place called Hartford Coffee Co, about a half mile from the house. I go there quite often but usually try to mix it up enough so that I am not the guy that comes in and takes up a table with books and a computer for 4ish hours every morning. While my intuitive side says mix it up, there is a certain 3rd place element to Hartford that I think is healthy, even if there is a part of me that recoils at being too familiar. Anyway, I just wanted to say that I am tying this from hartford as we speak, as I think your argument for the importance of places like this is right on.
Peter,
I am assuming from your post that you suggest that "bookish knowledge" falls short of experiential knowledge? Perhaps, Richard would agree since his site is called "experimental theology". Is this what diversity training about, dissolving prejuidice? as if prejuidice, itself is not based on some reasonable explaination itself?
It would indeed be ironic if those whose "bookish knowledge" require experience of others to prove their bookish knowledge!
On Fridays, we drop our kids at their schools and go out for a coffee date. We used to do Starbucks, but switched to McD's by the mall. There's a fascinating group of about a dozen mid-to-oldtimers (all men, and no young guns) who are meeting there each time. Some appear to be ACU cronies... They seem to have history together, and they have a great time, congregating for conversation and coffee on informal terms and neutral territory. I'm inclined to think that kind of diversity and neutrality won't likely happen in churches, though many of them have become radically informal in efforts to replicate that sort of "place."
Richard,
I had an interesting and revealing "experience" just now. My grand-daughter is in the hospital due to a UTI. I had not even thought of calling the church we attend, as I really question God's answering prayer, and I didn't want to bother them (but honestly, I have learned to not depend on the Church during crisis).
So, just now, my daughter told me that the church had called her husband's brother to inquire about our grand-daughter. I was livid. Why? Because it "said" to me that the "in group" was to discuss our situation without coming to us directly and asking. I felt objectified, not cared for. Now, I understand rationally, this was an emotional reaction to my previous experience of the church (not this speicific church) for over the last decade. And because of my intellectual dissolution of the Church as to authority, I am in a place to ask myself questions about the rationale of my faith, which are philosophical questions, not easliy answered, nor answered by everyone the same way.
I tell you this to underline the necessity of developing reasoned faith. Experiential faith is based on 'emoional messages" that meet felt needs, but are not based in critical realism. I want to explore where my faith plays out. Does the human being have value apart from function in society, if so, why? Do criminals deserve respect or any "rights" to trial by jury? If so, why? In understanding in/out groups, where are the lines to be drawn for me, rationally..and can I respond to prejuidce with a cool head and not a hot heart, distancing myself and not taking it personally.
This is important work for me, due to what faith means for and to me. and it is not based on outside sources of authority but reasoned philosophical questions and self- reflection, bringing coherency.
Hey Angie
Thanks for the push-back... didn't mean to say that stories do not contain knowledge, or that books are not experimental in knowledge formation. I think stories are, in many ways, the best way we learn (whether that be stories in books, or stories from real life). I just meant to say that I didn't have much to ADD to the post, but rather wanted to point out that I found it very personally applicable on this rainy Tuesday morning in StL.
Related to your comment, I was reading this morning an article by Nic Wolterstorff this morning that you might find interesting. He highlights the tendency of people in an academic setting to denigrate certain types of knowledge/ practice (specifically that of the craftsman). It's something I have an implicit tendency to do, to have a hierarchy of different types of work or forms of understanding.
Here is the wolterstorff article if anyone is interested:
http://lists.christianitytoday.com/t/13677890/4725692/167373/0/
Richard, when you mentioned the beer gardens in Germany, my mind quickly turned back to the month I spent in Leipzig. My experiences at a beer garden and in restaurants there were decidedly different from my customary dining out state-side. With the exception of eating out to celebrate a special occasion, I think our mindset toward eating out in America is one that's bent toward efficiency. Obviously, fast-food points to that, but I think it's the case for sit-down meals as well. Sure, we might chat a bit during the meal, but once the bill comes, we tend to pay up and be on our way. In Germany I sat in a restaurant once for close to three hours. Half of that time was after the bill came. Eating (or having a beer) there is almost as much about socializing as it is about the meal.
Peter, your mentioning of your local coffee shop made me think of Taylor Swift's Starbucked, an entertaining and insightful little book. At one point he discusses how Howard Schultz envisioned Starbucks as one of Oldenburg's "third places." Although you actually converse with people, I notice that frequently whenever I go to a Starbucks or any other coffee shop, there seems to be more people sitting alone reading or working on a laptop than socializing. I suppose those people can still find relaxation there although it would seem to do little to mitigate the aloneness Richard has addressed.
I wonder, too, how much bringing work to a coffee shop hinders it from being a true "third place." The school were I used to teach had "faculty retreats" every spring, where we would go to a more-than-Spartan camp in the hill country west of Austin. Eventually, the retreats became enjoyable, but the first couple were essentially off-site faculty meetings and work sessions, which pretty much sucked the relaxation right out of the retreat.
Peter,
There are some people I find that it is better to not engage in certain dialogue, as they tend to feel threatened, as it undermines their "reality".
It means that I cannot quesiton them, or their beliefs and I just let them think what they want to think, as that is how they have put their "world" together. And if they do not need it challenged, then why should I dissolve a relationship because I want to prove a point. But, these are not people that I can really relate on a deep level to, as their interests are not mine. That is just a fact of life. And that is why we choose to associate or dis-associate with who we do. There is nothing wrong with that.And I don't think it is anyone's "moral obligation" to train another in things they are not willingly and voluntarily desirous of learning...Life has enough bumps for us all, than to intentionally make problems for another..
So, I am not about "stories" but about "reality", as to what is of importance and why...and it is self-questioning as to my own values.
I'm trying to engage with this excellent series of posts from a British perspective. Granted, over here we have not tended to have the 'front porch' phenomenon - but, as noted, we still do have the pub, our gift to the world maybe.
Yet it would be true to say that arenas for diverse, heterogenous social interaction have shrunk here too. Just now, where I live in the South East of England, a cluster of new housing estates is being built, and our council has not taken care to insert public meeting space into the plans. Thus, and especially in winter, people leave their homes by car before sunrise and return after nightfall. There is no need to connect with anyone outside work or home. And, where people do, it is on the basis of networking, choice and, generally, one suspects, similarity of view and outlook.
I have been suggesting for some time that church, properly envisioned, can be the very place where all the goods Richard mentions in part 6 of this series - including the skills of welcome, debate, listening, inclusion and hospitality - can be practised and honed.
Anyway, there's a link at http://fizzogblog.typepad.com/fizzogblog/2009/03/alone-suburban-and-sorted.html, for what it's worth...
Richard,
Oldenburg's two places--domestic and work--are, it seems to me, not accurately described. Work is the overwhelmingly dominant of the two since the monetization and commodification of work which has gone on since the early 1970s. The average American worker in 1970 was male and worked the "traditional" forty hour week (with occasional overtime if a factory worker). Today, the average worker is both male and female (though females are paid at lower rates) and they work close to fifty hours per week--the addition of an entire day of work. Americans of both genders are now addicted to work because of what that social addiction promises. Thus, domesticity, in addition to informal social spaces, has also been marginalized, home being only a place to lay one's head for so many. The family and, especially, our children have suffered because of it.
I am reposting below what I wrote in response to your purple post. It is more appropriate here. I think we have to be intentional about place and conversation, which retrospectively seem to be more organic and traditional.
"In the Dallas area every first Friday evening of the month, a number of us gather for a salon at the Dallas Institute for Humanities and Culture for open conversation. We discuss a variety of matters, exchange opinions, and express our points of view. It is a safe "place," though not without risk for those set in their ways. Individuals don't often change their thinking, but they come away with their perspectives enriched. "Bridging" takes place and new friendships are sometimes made. It is a marvelous venue and I invite anyone in the area to be my guest at the Salon on 3 April or on 1 May.
By the way, bridging can, I think, take place in cyberspace. But it is much better in an actual place precisely because we are embodied."
Blessings!
It seems that there is concerted effort to "unite" our differences, to the dissolving of them.
Although I understand that this may have "noble underpinnings' of "peace and goodwill to all men", it limits our ability to live in the world reasonably. Some possibly don't need reasons, except for daily sustenance. Should I care, if someone doesn't eat? What is social or moral obligation to another when another is not acting responsibly?
The bail-out of AIG and the disregard for respectable and responsible behavior in our leaders in D.C. have left little moral example to appeal to the American public about thier "moral obligations or responsibilities" toward others....this is human nature, as we do not desire to do anything that those in leadership will not do, but requires of the "common person".The "common person" by example has been diminished by leadership disregard for the "rule of law", and the arrogant behavior toward those who do not have the same "power".
But, then again, it boils down to values and what one values most will determine who they respect for their leader....some respect practical leaders and others respect intellectual leaders....because some base their actions on beliefs or values, whereas others are more practical by nature. They don't "think" about the reasons. There is a "need", then do it...
Whenever decisions are made and there is disregard (which is really, disrespect) of someone's "life", then that life resents being told by those "others" what is to be done, or understood. This is where our social contract (the Constitution) is an important value, as it vales both employer and employee (citizen and governmental/representative leader)...
When I was reading your description of the "third place," I thought of the sitcom, "Cheers,"
"Where Ev'ry body knows your name, and they're always glad you came."
That theme song ends, "I wana be where ev'ry body knows your name."
Would that more churches were like that!
I had Cheers running through my head too, Jerry :)
Third places. This is why I get so het up about public spaces and why some of my friends think I am over-ranting when I get angry at the control freakishness that goes on within them there in Australia.
I go religiously to the football, and every time am irritated at how the shared spaces people occupy are drowned out by voiceovers and giant screens and bells and whistles and hoopla. Sort of like churches, just even more irritating, if possible.
The local pubs here, while looking much sexier than they did on average 15 years ago, are also more increasingly overrun by poker machines.
I thirst for local community places that belong to us all. I do suspect that they will begin popping up again, as we all come to realise that we are collectively rather insane without each other.
I love this series of posts Richard. Much food for thought.
Jerry & Sue,
Cheers is right on. The next post leads with the song...
Peter & Jason,
I'm wrestling a bit with how much to get into the Starbucks/Coffeeshop as Third Place issue. Last year Len Sweet was on our campus talking about his book The Gospel According to Starbucks. It's basically an appeal to the church to look at Starbucks as a model. Which hit me and a lot of people the wrong way, as Starbucks is basically the McDonalds of our generation. That said, as you noted Peter, when a group of regulars settle into a coffeeshop (Starbucks or not) I think a model for the church does emerge.
PJ,
I've noticed similar groups at the McDonalds by our house and the Jack & Jill. This post makes me want to do a sociological inventory of third places in the city. Abilene is small enough that I think a group of people could map them out.
fizzog & Sue,
I was hoping some of this might be interesting outside of an American context. Thanks for weighing in. Fizzog, we're on the same page. A part of what I'm interested in exploring is how the church might function as a third place or at least be a scattered people among the third places in the world.
Steve,
Having just sat through my son's Little League game yesterday I think attendance at sporting events can function as third places. Lot's of informal mixing among lots of different kinds of people at youth sporting events. As for larger venues of spectator sports, if seating arrangements are regular I think pockets of community can definitely emerge in those sections.
George,
At the end of the day your comments about intentionality are the critical component. Without being intentional and disciplined nothing is accomplished. A great third place can be right on my corner, but if I don't take the time to seek out and maintain relationships nothing comes of it.
Angie,
I hope your grand-daughter gets well. And I resonate with the journey you are on. I've been pursuing a "rational faith" for quite some time now.
yeah. i agree. the majority of the times in a coffeeshop I end up doing work. I see it being a third-way for many people at my local shop (they come it... there is an area for kids to play... really ecclectic neighborhood), but if I am honest, I rarely engage in its third-way potential as I sit back, do some work, and don't know many of the patrons.
This probably goes back to the notion of a third way not just being a place (though that is important) but also a posture of engagement. Thus Hartford Coffee Co COULD be a third way for me, but I often fail to engage it (them) at that level.
I remember reading or hearing at some point about Starbucks' business model centering on creating a third place experience as someone here mentioned. Its model has certainly attracted an incredible amount of business and I have spent a lot of time at their tables both alone and with people shelling out cash for the experience they work to create. Yet I don't think that third places in themselves are sufficient to change the culture.
There is a Starbucks near where I used to live in Virginia that was consistently packed with East and North African taxi drivers. They had made that cafe their central meeting spot, but the conversation that ensued was more a feature of their home culture than our American culture. I also identify with Jason and his experience in Leipzig. When I lived in France we constantly went to cafes, bars and restaurants for the social experiences. Here in Brazil, where I currently live, I see the same groups of men and women every morning when I walk my dog. They play volleyball, swim, walk, whatever.
All these stories are to illustrate what I see as the underlying problem that third places can't fix. The problem is the culture. I do not feel comfortable engaging strangers anywhere and I feel like that is the norm for many in my generation. I almost feel like I learned that engaging strangers in a public setting is taboo. If I feel that way then I imagine others do to so we go through life alone out of the fear of the unknown.
These are just thoughts I'm putting out there. I hope they aren't too much of a ramble. But this series has hit on some issues close to home and issues that underlie the future of interaction in our country. We'll see what lies ahead. Perhaps we can reverse the trend and recapture communities lost to individualism and consumerism.
Dan
http://theologypilgrim.wordpress.com
Interesting thoughts, Dan. I don't see third places as some magic space where change spreads out from. Instead, I see them as places where people can enter into their culture, in the way that they are currently not allowed to, and then the people are altered from within when they have some sort of validation for their existence.
Which sounds a bit more "poor me" than I meant to. I think ultimately WE are the culture, and yet we have been alienated from birth by this great horrid beast we live within.
I've been pondering lately about just how much is inherent to human beings. Are we born knowing how to love, or do we only learn to love when we are first loved? I feel like it is the same sort of thing in the culture. Do we learn to talk to strangers when we find ourselves in the culture in places that are safe to learn to do so?
I don't know if what I am saying makes any sense. Can't seem to convey what I am trying to convey, grrr. :)
Sue,
Scripture says, "We love because He first loved us." Children who are never loved do not learn to show love - yet they respond to love so quickly! The culture around us does shape us - but what we are is not fatalisticly determined by culture. We can rise above the culture of earth - because the culture of heaven has broken into this world in the person of Jesus.