TED Talk by Sam Harris on the fact/value split and the notion that science can produce moral judgments:
Email Subscription on Substack
Richard Beck
Welcome to the blog of Richard Beck, author and professor of psychology at Abilene Christian University (beckr@acu.edu).
The Theology of Faƫrie
The Little Way of St. ThĆ©rĆØse of Lisieux
The William Stringfellow Project (Ongoing)
Autobiographical Posts
- On Discoveries in Used Bookstores
- Two Brothers and Texas Rangers
- Visiting and Evolving in Monkey Town
- Roller Derby Girls
- A Life With Bibles
- Wearing a Crucifix
- Morning Prayer at San Buenaventura Mission
- The Halo of Overalls
- Less
- The Farmer's Market
- Subversion and Shame: I Like the Color Pink
- The Bureaucrat
- Uncle Richard, Vampire Hunter
- Palm Sunday with the Orthodox
- On Maps and Marital Spats
- Get on a Bike...and Go Slow
- Buying a Bible
- Memento Mori
- We Weren't as Good as the Muppets
- Uncle Richard and the Shark
- Growing Up Catholic
- Ghostbusting (Part 1)
- Ghostbusting (Part 2)
- My Eschatological Dog
- Tex Mex and Depression Era Cuisine
- Aliens at Roswell
On the Principalities and Powers
- Christ and the Powers
- Why I Talk about the Devil So Much
- The Preferential Option for the Poor
- The Political Theology of Les MisƩrables
- Good Enough
- On Anarchism and A**holes
- Christian Anarchism
- A Restless Patriotism
- Wink on Exorcism
- Images of God Against Empire
- A Boredom Revolution
- The Medal of St. Benedict
- Exorcisms are about Economics
- "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You?"
- "A Home for Demons...and the Merchants Weep"
- Tales of the Demonic
- The Ethic of Death: The Policies and Procedures Manual
- "All That Are Here Are Humans"
- Ears of Stone
- The War Prayer
- Letter from a Birmingham Jail
Experimental Theology
- Eucharistic Identity
- Tzimtzum, Cruciformity and Theodicy
- Holiness Among Depraved Christians: Paul's New Form of Moral Flourishing
- Empathic Open Theism
- The Victim Needs No Conversion
- The Hormonal God
- Covenantal Substitutionary Atonement
- The Satanic Church
- Mousetrap
- Easter Shouldn't Be Good News
- The Gospel According to Lady Gaga
- Your God is Too Big
From the Prison Bible Study
- The Philosopher
- God's Unconditional Love
- There is a Balm in Gilead
- In Prison With Ann Voskamp
- To Make the Love of God Credible
- Piss Christ in Prison
- Advent: A Prison Story
- Faithful in Little Things
- The Prayer of Jabez
- The Prayer of Willy Brown
- Those Old Time Gospel Songs
- I'll Fly Away
- Singing and Resistence
- Where the Gospel Matters
- Monday Night Bible Study (A Poem)
- Living in Babylon: Reading Revelation in Prison
- Reading the Beatitudes in Prision
- John 13: A Story from the Prision Study
- The Word
Series/Essays Based on my Research
The Theology of Calvin and Hobbes
The Theology of Peanuts
The Snake Handling Churches of Appalachia
Eccentric Christianity
- Part 1: A Peculiar People
- Part 2: The Eccentric God, Transcendence and the Prophetic Imagination
- Part 3: Welcoming God in the Stranger
- Part 4: Enchantment, the Porous Self and the Spirit
- Part 5: Doubt, Gratitude and an Eccentric Faith
- Part 6: The Eccentric Economy of Love
- Part 7: The Eccentric Kingdom
The Fuller Integration Lectures
Blogging about the Bible
- Unicorns in the Bible
- "Let My People Go!": On Worship, Work and Laziness
- The True Troubler
- Stumbling At Just One Point
- The Faith of Demons
- The Lord Saw That She Was Not Loved
- The Subversion of the Creator God
- Hell On Earth: The Church as the Baptism of Fire and the Holy Spirit
- The Things That Make for Peace
- The Lord of the Flies
- On Preterism, the Second Coming and Hell
- Commitment and Violence: A Reading of the Akedah
- Gain Versus Gift in Ecclesiastes
- Redemption and the Goel
- The Psalms as Liberation Theology
- Control Your Vessel
- Circumcised Ears
- Forgive Us Our Trespasses
- Doing Beautiful Things
- The Most Remarkable Sequence in the Bible
- Targeting the Dove Sellers
- Christus Victor in Galatians
- Devoted to Destruction: Reading Cherem Non-Violently
- The Triumph of the Cross
- The Threshing Floor of Araunah
- Hold Others Above Yourself
- Blessed are the Tricksters
- Adam's First Wife
- I Am a Worm
- Christus Victor in the Lord's Prayer
- Let Them Both Grow Together
- Repent
- Here I Am
- Becoming the Jubilee
- Sermon on the Mount: Study Guide
- Treat Them as a Pagan or Tax Collector
- Going Outside the Camp
- Welcoming Children
- The Song of Lamech and the Song of the Lamb
- The Nephilim
- Shaming Jesus
- Pseudepigrapha and the Christian Witness
- The Exclusion and Inclusion of Eunuchs
- The Second Moses
- The New Manna
- Salvation in the First Sermons of the Church
- "A Bloody Husband"
- Song of the Vineyard
Bonhoeffer's Letters from Prision
Civil Rights History and Race Relations
- The Gospel According to Ta-Nehisi Coates (Six Part Series)
- Bus Ride to Justice: Toward Racial Reconciliation in the Churches of Christ
- Black Heroism and White Sympathy: A Reflection on the Charleston Shooting
- Selma 50th Anniversary
- More Than Three Minutes
- The Passion of White America
- Remembering James Chaney, Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman
- Will Campbell
- Sitting in the Pews of Ebeneser Baptist Church
- MLK Bedtime Prayer
- Freedom Rider
- Mountiantop
- Freedom Summer
- Civil Rights Family Trip 1: Memphis
- Civil Rights Family Trip 2: Atlanta
- Civil Rights Family Trip 3: Birmingham
- Civil Rights Family Trip 4: Selma
- Civil Rights Family Trip 5: Montgomery
Hip Christianity
The Charism of the Charismatics
Would Jesus Break a Window?: The Hermeneutics of the Temple Action
Being Church
- Instead of a Coffee Shop How About a Laundromat?
- A Million Boring Little Things
- A Prayer for ISIS
- "The People At Our Church Die A Lot"
- The Angel of Freedom
- Washing Dishes at Freedom Fellowship
- Where David Plays the Tambourine
- On Interruptibility
- Mattering
- This Ritual of Hallowing
- Faith as Honoring
- The Beautiful
- The Sensory Boundary
- The Missional and Apostolic Nature of Holiness
- Open Commuion: Warning!
- The Impurity of Love
- A Community Called Forgiveness
- Love is the Allocation of Our Dying
- Freedom Fellowship
- Wednesday Night Church
- The Hands of Christ
- Barbara, Stanley and Andrea: Thoughts on Love, Training and Social Psychology
- Gerald's Gift
- Wiping the Blood Away
- This Morning Jesus Put On Dark Sunglasses
- The Only Way I Know How to Save the World
- Renunciation
- The Reason We Gather
- Anointing With Oil
- Incarnations of God's Mercy
Exploring Preterism
Scripture and Discernment
- Owning Your Protestantism: We Follow Our Conscience, Not the Bible
- Emotional Intelligence and Sola Scriptura
- Songbooks vs. the Psalms
- Biblical as Sociological Stress Test
- Cookie Cutting the Bible: A Case Study
- Pawn to King 4
- Allowing God to Rage
- Poetry of a Murderer
- On Christian Communion: Killing vs. Sexuality
- Heretics and Disagreement
- Atonement: A Primer
- "The Bible says..."
- The "Yes, but..." Church
- Human Experience and the Bible
- Discernment, Part 1
- Discernment, Part 2
- Rabbinic Hedges
- Fuzzy Logic
Interacting with Good Books
- Christian Political Witness
- The Road
- Powers and Submissions
- City of God
- Playing God
- Torture and Eucharist
- How Much is Enough?
- From Willow Creek to Sacred Heart
- The Catonsville Nine
- Daring Greatly
- On Job (GutiƩrrez)
- The Selfless Way of Christ
- World Upside Down
- Are Christians Hate-Filled Hypocrites?
- Christ and Horrors
- The King Jesus Gospel
- Insurrection
- The Bible Made Impossible
- The Deliverance of God
- To Change the World
- Sexuality and the Christian Body
- I Told Me So
- The Teaching of the Twelve
- Evolving in Monkey Town
- Saved from Sacrifice: A Series
- Darwin's Sacred Cause
- Outliers
- A Secular Age
- The God Who Risks
Moral Psychology
- The Dark Spell the Devil Casts: Refugees and Our Slavery to the Fear of Death
- Philia Over Phobia
- Elizabeth Smart and the Psychology of the Christian Purity Culture
- On Love and the Yuck Factor
- Ethnocentrism and Politics
- Flies, Attention and Morality
- The Banality of Evil
- The Ovens at Buchenwald
- Violence and Traffic Lights
- Defending Individualism
- Guilt and Atonement
- The Varieties of Love and Hate
- The Wicked
- Moral Foundations
- Primum non nocere
- The Moral Emotions
- The Moral Circle, Part 1
- The Moral Circle, Part 2
- Taboo Psychology
- The Morality of Mentality
- Moral Conviction
- Infrahumanization
- Holiness and Moral Grammars
The Purity Psychology of Progressive Christianity
The Theology of Everyday Life
- Self-Esteem Through Shaming
- Let Us Be the Heart Of the Church Rather Than the Amygdala
- Online Debates and Stages of Change
- The Devil on a Wiffle Ball Field
- Incarnational Theology and Mental Illness
- Social Media as Sacrament
- The Impossibility of Calvinistic Psychotherapy
- Hating Pixels
- Dress, Divinity and Dumbfounding
- The Kingdom of God Will Not Be Tweeted
- Tattoos
- The Ethics of :-)
- On Snobbery
- Jokes
- Hypocrisy
- Everything I learned about life I learned coaching tee-ball
- Gossip, Part 1: The Food of the Brain
- Gossip, Part 2: Evolutionary Stable Strategies
- Gossip, Part 3: The Pay it Forward World
- Human Nature
- Welcome
- On Humility
Jesus, You're Making Me Tired: Scarcity and Spiritual Formation
A Progressive Vision of the Benedict Option
George MacDonald
Jesus & the Jolly Roger: The Kingdom of God is Like a Pirate
Alone, Suburban & Sorted
The Theology of Monsters
The Theology of Ugly
Orthodox Iconography
Musings On Faith, Belief, and Doubt
- The Meanings Only Faith Can Reveal
- Pragmatism and Progressive Christianity
- Doubt and Cognitive Rumination
- A/theism and the Transcendent
- Kingdom A/theism
- The Ontological Argument
- Cheap Praise and Costly Praise
- god
- Wired to Suffer
- A New Apologetics
- Orthodox Alexithymia
- High and Low: The Psalms and Suffering
- The Buddhist Phase
- Skilled Christianity
- The Two Families of God
- The Bait and Switch of Contemporary Christianity
- Theodicy and No Country for Old Men
- Doubt: A Diagnosis
- Faith and Modernity
- Faith after "The Cognitive Turn"
- Salvation
- The Gifts of Doubt
- A Beautiful Life
- Is Santa Claus Real?
- The Feeling of Knowing
- Practicing Christianity
- In Praise of Doubt
- Skepticism and Conviction
- Pragmatic Belief
- N-Order Complaint and Need for Cognition
Holiday Musings
- Everything I Learned about Christmas I Learned from TV
- Advent: Learning to Wait
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 1
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 2
- It's Still Christmas
- Easter Shouldn't Be Good News
- The Deeper Magic: A Good Friday Meditation
- Palm Sunday with the Orthodox
- Growing Up Catholic: A Lenten Meditation
- The Liturgical Year for Dummies
- "Watching Their Flocks at Night": An Advent Meditation
- Pentecost and Babel
- Epiphany
- Ambivalence about Lent
- On Easter and Astronomy
- Sex Sandals and Advent
- Freud and Valentine's Day
- Existentialism and Halloween
- Halloween Redux: Talking with the Dead
The Offbeat
- Batman and the Joker
- The Theology of Ugly Dolls
- Jesus Would Be a Hufflepuff
- The Moral Example of Captain Jack Sparrow
- Weddings Real, Imagined and Yet to Come
- Michelangelo and Neuroanatomy
- Believing in Bigfoot
- The Kingdom of God as Improv and Flash Mob
- 2012 and the End of the World
- The Polar Express and the Uncanny Valley
- Why the Anti-Christ Is an Idiot
- On Harry Potter and Vampire Movies
Lots of good stuff here. But, just to play devil's advocate, I have a question. Doesn't he begin with a false assumption? He says that we treat primates better than rocks or insects because of the range of conscious experience. And the level of conscious awareness is measurable, thus we might be wrong. But, he does not give a reason why conscious experience is grounds for moral preference. There are other ways to conceive of moral preference. He obviously does a good job of talking about how facts are critical to making value judgments on how humans flourish. But, he still doesn't answer the "why we ought to" question.
I agree. I think he makes good points about facts and values having a lot to do with each other. But there are too many missing steps in the argument he wants to make.
Harris says that "The demagogues are right that we need a universal conception of moral value." But embedded in his view is that the criterion is human flourishing. There are huge questions that arise about that, which he does not even mention, let alone address. For one, are we to treat human flourishing, then, as an unconditional good? The answer would seem to be, obviously, NO! But what about the FACT that no one has the guts to admit that we have to confront that question before we tragically outstrip our biosphere's ability to sustain the population, or human flourishing may well bring about human tragedy on a mass scale. But if we do admit that human flourishing is not an absolute good, then we need to ask a host of very unattractive questions: One by one, which ideas of flourishing must we curtail or eliminate and which can we endorse. And presumably we will be looking to the future with a preferred view of human flourishing in mind to make those judgments.
Here's a better approach. Forbid the thinking of oneself or anyone else as a god, and forbid the conceiving or making of gods, while thinking of ourselves as in a garden where anyone and anything can become a weed if it functions like a god/weed. Then seek the best information and the purest good will in carrying out our lives in this garden. It sounds oddly familiar. :)
The goal is to bring fact and value together in the optimal way. That can't be accomplished till we--including Harris--get over ourselves and put the hard questions on the table. Till then we will continue to think unproductively about the challenges ahead.
Of course, trusting anyone to do this kind of radical appraisal of human future is very difficult. I need a model of radical goodness, love and courage that cannot be reduced to an idolatrous god to guide me. Which is why I cling to my Christian faith.
Tracy
BTW: Harris' approach is Aristotelian. The Nichomachean Ethics contains everything he said, implicitly.
I think the reverse is true as well. Christians mistakenly try to treat the Bible as if it were a science textbook, as if it were a document written by a modern Western empiricist. Instead of looking at the Bible in the context of the minds and times it was written, it's treated like a collection of literal facts that stand without interpretation. And this is how we get Christians opposing a heliocentric solar system, or lightning rods, or evolution. It's so hard to stamp this attitude out, it's a category error. Also - it leads to a certain indifference in fundamentalism to demonstrable facts.
Harris makes a volume of mistakes here that I wish to briefly point out:
1) He presents the image of a moral landscape claiming there are various "ways" of equivalent moral structure. He then proceeds to make the argument for a universal moral structure. Does he believe that the universal can be compatible with the landscape? Does he want Roman Catholicism or Protestantism?
2) He treats science as static. His use of a string theorist who is the "smartest" physicist around implies that beyond this guy, there is nothing more to know. For all we know, someone could figure out that the guy was actually completely misguided, knew nothing about the very basest levels of physical matter, and disprove everything he ever taught. This type of thing has happened over and over again in science. After Einstein everyone "knew" Relativity was true. Now, it is in question. For a while everyone "knew" gravity was the strongest force in the universe. Now, we know that is not true. The point being, scientific fact, in many cases, can be debatable. Hardly is it as objective as he makes it out to be.
3) He is painfully unaware of his own cultural heritage. He makes statements as though they are self-evident forms of morality. Case in point, he jokingly discusses the immorality of abusing children in class as though hitting a child with a rod is clearly wrong. However, as little as 100 years ago, not hitting a child with a rod would be seen as immoral whether you were a Christian or an atheist. On a different moral landscape, his assumptions would be met with serious confusion and dissent. This goes to show that the accepted forms of morality are not static either. Hence, he misses the boat on how science and morality are similar. He wants to become a form of atheist Pope (made clear by his appraisal of religious demagogues), but unfortunately, life is not so cut and dry.
4) He carefully selected his caricatures. He picked the Dalai Lama. A Buddhist leader works very well for Harris because Buddhism is inherently atheist and humanist. Aside from their metaphysical views, Harris and the Dalai Lama see quite eye to eye. Had he picked another person, say, Mother Theresa or Dorothy Day, we would be looking at an entirely different argument. He could not avoid that those two women were extremely driven by their belief in G-d (despite Mother Theresa's dark night of the soul). Juxtaposed against a serial killer, the Dalai Lama's humanism prevails; against a Christian, G-d would prevail. Can't have that, can we Sam?
Overall, I would say he contributed nothing to the argument. He represents a play actor who plays on people's innate longing for peace, justice, and righteousness. His only problem is he cannot even locate where that comes from. He can only say it should be there. Thanks for posting this Dr. Beck.
ben adam,
I agree that Harris' perspective is a bit simplistic, and agree with some of the critiques posted above. That said, for what it's worth I disagree with you regarding the 'mistakes' you pointed out.
1. Harris addressed the compatibility of the 'universal' and the 'landscape' with the analogy of food: the existence of the multiplicity of things that qualify as good, healthy food does not impugn the proposition that there is indeed such a thing.
Likewise, Harris may say that the moral structure of scientific naturalism (himself) and the Dalai Lama and (say) the Unitarians are 'good', and that the moral structure of neo-Nazis and al Qaeda and Pat Robertson are harmful.
I think your mistake here lies with your misunderstanding that he is claiming equivalent moral structure within the diversity of the landscape. I don't have to claim that fresh fruits and vegetables are equally as nutritive as a Big Mac to make the claim that they are both nutritive in contrast with strychnine or dog feces. (And again, though both strychnine and dog feces are both non-nutritive, they are not equally so.)
2. I refer you to Isaac Asimov's The Relativity of Wrong. As with nutrition and morality, 'wrongness' in science does not imply equal wrongness. "[W]hen people thought the earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together."
3. Regarding corporal punishment, what I take Harris to be saying is that there are objective, scientific ways to assess whether such practices are helpful or harmful to a child's psychological development. It doesn't matter how many thousands of years it has been practiced, or how great a majority believes it is correct, we can say definitively that it is harmful to children to beat them, harmful to women to force them into burqas, harmful to humans to force them into slavery.
4. On the contrary, I think Mother Teresa, Martin Luther King, Dorothy Day, Archbishop Romero, Gandhi, etc., would have all fit very well within his schema. All showed a very humanistic faith, all worked for the common good, all had more healthy moral systems than Ted Bundy or David Duke.
The earlier criticisms of Harris' preconceptions about the criterion of human flourishing and consciousness as the basis for compassion and morality strike me as apt. But ultimately these 'mistakes' that you call out ring hollow to me.
Huh... Speaking as someone who is looking hard for meaning and value outside of religious domain, I'm pretty disappointed with this talk. More/better facts make for better judgments-- that is quite an underwhelming premise for a TED talk. I want to see the facts that led to "human flourishing" as a moral principle that should guide moral decisions. Furthermore, I would like to have seen some acknowledgement of the disasters that the is/ought primrose path has led to in the past. For example, behaviorism of the mid 1900s and the atrocities of communism--governments making decisions about "ought" based on a false premise of "is" coming out what was being learned about psychology at the time. You can't just go pointing your finger at religious fanatics who strap bombs to themselves, without pointing fingers at the leaders who killed millions in part because of "facts" from science.
More sophomoric junk from Mr. Harris. This guy plans on emotions more than any substantial critical thinking or evidence.