War with the Dragon Who is Wasting Fairyland

I've been reading Wisdom and Innocence: A Life of G.K. Chesterton. The book pointed me toward some of Chesterton's reflections about Satan, demonology, and exorcism in his Europe to Palestine travelogue The New Jerusalem. Chesterton's reflections echo much of what I cover in my book Reviving Old Scratch. These passages come from the chapter "The Battle with the Dragon":
For it is only when we understand that Christ, considered merely as a prophet...that we can feel that tremendous and tragic energy of his testimony to an ugly reality, the existence of unnatural things. Instead of taking a [single Biblical] text as I have done, take a whole Gospel and read it steadily and honestly and straight through at a sitting, and you will certainly have one impression, whether of a myth or of a man. It is that the exorcist towers above the poet and even the prophet; that the story between Cana and Calvary is one long war with demons. He understood better than a hundred poets the beauty of the flowers of the battle-field; but he came out to battle. And if most of his words mean anything they do mean that there is at our very feet, like a chasm concealed among the flowers, an unfathomable evil...

I say such things in no mood of spiritual pride; such things are hideous not because they are distant but because they are near to us; in all our brains, certainly in mine, were buried things as bad as any buried under that bitter sea [Chesterton was looking out over the Dead Sea plain where Sodom and Gomorrah are believed to be located], and if He did not come to do battle with them, even in the darkness of the brain of man, I know not why He came. Certainly it was not only to talk about flowers or to talk about Socialism. The more truly we can see life as a fairy-tale, the more clearly the tale resolves itself into war with the Dragon who is wasting fairyland. I will not enter on the theology behind the symbol; but I am sure it was of this that all the symbols were symbolic. I remember distinguished men among the liberal theologians, who found it more difficult to believe in one devil than in many. They admitted in the New Testament an attestation to evil spirits, but not to a general enemy of mankind. As some are said to want the drama of Hamlet without the Prince of Denmark, they would have the drama of Hell without the Prince of Darkness. I say nothing of these things, save that the language of the Gospel seems to me to go much more singly to a single issue. The voice that is heard there has such authority as speaks to an army; and the highest note of it is victory rather than peace. When the apostles were first sent forth with their faces to the four corners of the earth, and turned again to acclaim their master, he did not say in that hour of triumph, "All are aspects of one harmonious whole" or "The universe evolves through progress to perfection" or "All things find their end in Nirvana" or "The dewdrop slips into the shining sea." He looked up and said, "I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven."
There are some great lines here:

"the exorcist towers above the poet and even the prophet"

"the story between Cana and Calvary is one long war with demons"

"there is at our very feet, like a chasm concealed among the flowers, an unfathomable evil"

"such things are hideous not because they are distant but because they are near to us"

"in all our brains, certainly in mine, [are] buried things as bad as any buried under that bitter sea, and if He did not come to do battle with them, even in the darkness of the brain of man, I know not why He came." 

And the most famous of all these lines:

"The more truly we can see life as a fairy-tale, the more clearly the tale resolves itself into war with the Dragon who is wasting fairyland."

This entry was posted by Richard Beck. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply