viii.
In April 25, 1960 Peanuts ran one of its most famous strips:
Images from The Complete Peanuts by Fantagraphics Books
A year later it was suggested to Schulz to take Lucy's "moment of revelation" (1) and turn it into a book. Schulz was hesitant at first but, after a long day's work, he created all the cameos that would eventually be published in the first Peanuts book Happiness Is a Warm Puppy.
David Michaelis tells the story of the publication of Happiness Is a Warm Puppy:
"Booksellers had never sold a hardcover quite like the offering that Determined Productions shipped to stores in November 1962, only weeks after the United States and the Soviet Union had come to the brink of thermonuclear war. The Cuban missile crisis had just died down, and people were again remembering to shave, when Schulz's small, square volume--complete with mocha-shade dust jacket, shocking-pink endpapers, and brightly colored pages--arrived in bookshops accompanied by a letter that closed, 'It won't change the world but we hope it will make things a little more pleasant for us survivors.'
Peanuts offered no solutions to the world's problems--rather, it made them more visible; neither did Schulz's strip depict, or seek to depict, any final overcoming of life's anguishes. In Happiness Is a Warm Puppy, the familiar Peanuts troupe served only to illustrate, as Schulz explained it, the 'little moments you remember when you stop and think back over your life.'" (2)
The contents of Happiness Is a Warm Puppy was the stuff of life. For example:
Happiness is...
...an 'A' on your spelling test.
...finding someone you like at the door.
...sleeping in your own bed.
...getting together with friends.
...climbing a tree.
...a good old fashioned game of hide and seek.
...a bread and butter sandwich folded over.
...walking in the grass in your bare feet.
By December 2 of 1962 Happiness Is a Warm Puppy reached the national best-seller list and remained there for forty-three weeks. A year later Happiness Is a Warm Puppy was the #1 best-selling non-fiction book.
ix.
The message of Happiness Is a Warm Puppy converges on the wisdom of Qoheleth, the writer of Ecclesiastes. Throughout Ecclesiastes Qoheleth is confronted with the "vanity" and "meaninglessness" of life. The Hebrew word rendered as "vanity" is hevel. Hevel is difficult to translate. Literally, it means "breath." More abstractly, hevel hints at insubstantiality, transitoriness, and ephemerality. Thus, chasing after or trying to capture hevel is absurd, pointless, meaningless, ironic, and a manifestation of human vanity. Or, in the poetry of Qoheleth, it is "chasing after the wind":
So I hated life, because the work that is done under the sun was grievous to me. All of it is meaningless, a chasing after the wind. I hated all the things I had toiled for under the sun, because I must leave them to the one who comes after me. And who knows whether he will be a wise man or a fool? Yet he will have control over all the work into which I have poured my effort and skill under the sun. This too is meaningless. So my heart began to despair over all my toilsome labor under the sun. For a man may do his work with wisdom, knowledge and skill, and then he must leave all he owns to someone who has not worked for it. This too is meaningless and a great misfortune. What does a man get for all the toil and anxious striving with which he labors under the sun? All his days his work is pain and grief; even at night his mind does not rest. This too is meaningless.
But interspersed throughout this depressing message, Qoheleth's wisdom points us to more modest pleasures, ones that are close at hand and often overlooked or taken for granted. Rather than striving in heroic fashion, pursuing enduring wealth, fame, or knowledge, Qoheleth (and Peanuts) suggests should enjoy the simpler things of life: food, drink, and the warmth of companionship:
A man can do nothing better than to eat and drink and find satisfaction in his work.
What does the worker gain from his toil?...I know that there is nothing better for men than to be happy and do good while they live. That everyone may eat and drink, and find satisfaction in all his toil—this is the gift of God.
Two are better than one,
because they have a good return for their work:
If one falls down,
his friend can help him up.
But pity the man who falls
and has no one to help him up!
Also, if two lie down together, they will keep warm.
But how can one keep warm alone?
Then I realized that it is good and proper for a man to eat and drink, and to find satisfaction in his toilsome labor under the sun during the few days of life God has given him—for this is his lot. Moreover, when God gives any man wealth and possessions, and enables him to enjoy them, to accept his lot and be happy in his work—this is a gift of God.
So I commend the enjoyment of life, because nothing is better for a man under the sun than to eat and drink and be glad. Then joy will accompany him in his work all the days of the life God has given him under the sun.
Go, eat your food with gladness, and drink your wine with a joyful heart, for it is now that God favors what you do. 8 Always be clothed in white, and always anoint your head with oil. Enjoy life with your wife, whom you love, all the days of this meaningless life that God has given you under the sun—all your meaningless days.
However many years a man may live, let him enjoy them all.
x.
Like Peanuts Qoheleth gives us no final answer. Happiness is not a grand, enduring thing. It is the joy in the moment and is found wherever you can find it. Will all these moments add up to something more substantial? Qoheleth and Peanuts do not, cannot, answer. And neither can I.
But the wisdom of their modest advice still lingers: You have today, enjoy it. Perhaps no one said it better than Robert Louis Stevenson:
The best things in life are nearest:
Breath in your nostrils,
light in your eyes,
flowers at your feet,
duties at your hand,
the path of right just before you.
Then do not grasp at the stars,
but do life's plain,
common work as it comes,
certain that daily duties
and daily bread
are the sweetest things in life.
--End Chapter 6--
Post-Script:
If you don't like Stevenson how about the sentiment of Hobbes?
Who knows about tomorrow or death? Regardless, I'm with Hobbes. I'll take it anyway.
And yes, thanks to Kimberly, I'm planning on writing The Theology of Calvin and Hobbes...
Notes:
(1) p. 337 Schulz and Peanuts
(2) p. 338 Ibid
Email Subscription on Substack
Richard Beck
Welcome to the blog of Richard Beck, author and professor of psychology at Abilene Christian University (beckr@acu.edu).
The Theology of Faƫrie
The Little Way of St. ThĆ©rĆØse of Lisieux
The William Stringfellow Project (Ongoing)
Autobiographical Posts
- On Discoveries in Used Bookstores
- Two Brothers and Texas Rangers
- Visiting and Evolving in Monkey Town
- Roller Derby Girls
- A Life With Bibles
- Wearing a Crucifix
- Morning Prayer at San Buenaventura Mission
- The Halo of Overalls
- Less
- The Farmer's Market
- Subversion and Shame: I Like the Color Pink
- The Bureaucrat
- Uncle Richard, Vampire Hunter
- Palm Sunday with the Orthodox
- On Maps and Marital Spats
- Get on a Bike...and Go Slow
- Buying a Bible
- Memento Mori
- We Weren't as Good as the Muppets
- Uncle Richard and the Shark
- Growing Up Catholic
- Ghostbusting (Part 1)
- Ghostbusting (Part 2)
- My Eschatological Dog
- Tex Mex and Depression Era Cuisine
- Aliens at Roswell
On the Principalities and Powers
- Christ and the Powers
- Why I Talk about the Devil So Much
- The Preferential Option for the Poor
- The Political Theology of Les MisƩrables
- Good Enough
- On Anarchism and A**holes
- Christian Anarchism
- A Restless Patriotism
- Wink on Exorcism
- Images of God Against Empire
- A Boredom Revolution
- The Medal of St. Benedict
- Exorcisms are about Economics
- "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You?"
- "A Home for Demons...and the Merchants Weep"
- Tales of the Demonic
- The Ethic of Death: The Policies and Procedures Manual
- "All That Are Here Are Humans"
- Ears of Stone
- The War Prayer
- Letter from a Birmingham Jail
Experimental Theology
- Eucharistic Identity
- Tzimtzum, Cruciformity and Theodicy
- Holiness Among Depraved Christians: Paul's New Form of Moral Flourishing
- Empathic Open Theism
- The Victim Needs No Conversion
- The Hormonal God
- Covenantal Substitutionary Atonement
- The Satanic Church
- Mousetrap
- Easter Shouldn't Be Good News
- The Gospel According to Lady Gaga
- Your God is Too Big
From the Prison Bible Study
- The Philosopher
- God's Unconditional Love
- There is a Balm in Gilead
- In Prison With Ann Voskamp
- To Make the Love of God Credible
- Piss Christ in Prison
- Advent: A Prison Story
- Faithful in Little Things
- The Prayer of Jabez
- The Prayer of Willy Brown
- Those Old Time Gospel Songs
- I'll Fly Away
- Singing and Resistence
- Where the Gospel Matters
- Monday Night Bible Study (A Poem)
- Living in Babylon: Reading Revelation in Prison
- Reading the Beatitudes in Prision
- John 13: A Story from the Prision Study
- The Word
Series/Essays Based on my Research
The Theology of Calvin and Hobbes
The Theology of Peanuts
The Snake Handling Churches of Appalachia
Eccentric Christianity
- Part 1: A Peculiar People
- Part 2: The Eccentric God, Transcendence and the Prophetic Imagination
- Part 3: Welcoming God in the Stranger
- Part 4: Enchantment, the Porous Self and the Spirit
- Part 5: Doubt, Gratitude and an Eccentric Faith
- Part 6: The Eccentric Economy of Love
- Part 7: The Eccentric Kingdom
The Fuller Integration Lectures
Blogging about the Bible
- Unicorns in the Bible
- "Let My People Go!": On Worship, Work and Laziness
- The True Troubler
- Stumbling At Just One Point
- The Faith of Demons
- The Lord Saw That She Was Not Loved
- The Subversion of the Creator God
- Hell On Earth: The Church as the Baptism of Fire and the Holy Spirit
- The Things That Make for Peace
- The Lord of the Flies
- On Preterism, the Second Coming and Hell
- Commitment and Violence: A Reading of the Akedah
- Gain Versus Gift in Ecclesiastes
- Redemption and the Goel
- The Psalms as Liberation Theology
- Control Your Vessel
- Circumcised Ears
- Forgive Us Our Trespasses
- Doing Beautiful Things
- The Most Remarkable Sequence in the Bible
- Targeting the Dove Sellers
- Christus Victor in Galatians
- Devoted to Destruction: Reading Cherem Non-Violently
- The Triumph of the Cross
- The Threshing Floor of Araunah
- Hold Others Above Yourself
- Blessed are the Tricksters
- Adam's First Wife
- I Am a Worm
- Christus Victor in the Lord's Prayer
- Let Them Both Grow Together
- Repent
- Here I Am
- Becoming the Jubilee
- Sermon on the Mount: Study Guide
- Treat Them as a Pagan or Tax Collector
- Going Outside the Camp
- Welcoming Children
- The Song of Lamech and the Song of the Lamb
- The Nephilim
- Shaming Jesus
- Pseudepigrapha and the Christian Witness
- The Exclusion and Inclusion of Eunuchs
- The Second Moses
- The New Manna
- Salvation in the First Sermons of the Church
- "A Bloody Husband"
- Song of the Vineyard
Bonhoeffer's Letters from Prision
Civil Rights History and Race Relations
- The Gospel According to Ta-Nehisi Coates (Six Part Series)
- Bus Ride to Justice: Toward Racial Reconciliation in the Churches of Christ
- Black Heroism and White Sympathy: A Reflection on the Charleston Shooting
- Selma 50th Anniversary
- More Than Three Minutes
- The Passion of White America
- Remembering James Chaney, Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman
- Will Campbell
- Sitting in the Pews of Ebeneser Baptist Church
- MLK Bedtime Prayer
- Freedom Rider
- Mountiantop
- Freedom Summer
- Civil Rights Family Trip 1: Memphis
- Civil Rights Family Trip 2: Atlanta
- Civil Rights Family Trip 3: Birmingham
- Civil Rights Family Trip 4: Selma
- Civil Rights Family Trip 5: Montgomery
Hip Christianity
The Charism of the Charismatics
Would Jesus Break a Window?: The Hermeneutics of the Temple Action
Being Church
- Instead of a Coffee Shop How About a Laundromat?
- A Million Boring Little Things
- A Prayer for ISIS
- "The People At Our Church Die A Lot"
- The Angel of Freedom
- Washing Dishes at Freedom Fellowship
- Where David Plays the Tambourine
- On Interruptibility
- Mattering
- This Ritual of Hallowing
- Faith as Honoring
- The Beautiful
- The Sensory Boundary
- The Missional and Apostolic Nature of Holiness
- Open Commuion: Warning!
- The Impurity of Love
- A Community Called Forgiveness
- Love is the Allocation of Our Dying
- Freedom Fellowship
- Wednesday Night Church
- The Hands of Christ
- Barbara, Stanley and Andrea: Thoughts on Love, Training and Social Psychology
- Gerald's Gift
- Wiping the Blood Away
- This Morning Jesus Put On Dark Sunglasses
- The Only Way I Know How to Save the World
- Renunciation
- The Reason We Gather
- Anointing With Oil
- Incarnations of God's Mercy
Exploring Preterism
Scripture and Discernment
- Owning Your Protestantism: We Follow Our Conscience, Not the Bible
- Emotional Intelligence and Sola Scriptura
- Songbooks vs. the Psalms
- Biblical as Sociological Stress Test
- Cookie Cutting the Bible: A Case Study
- Pawn to King 4
- Allowing God to Rage
- Poetry of a Murderer
- On Christian Communion: Killing vs. Sexuality
- Heretics and Disagreement
- Atonement: A Primer
- "The Bible says..."
- The "Yes, but..." Church
- Human Experience and the Bible
- Discernment, Part 1
- Discernment, Part 2
- Rabbinic Hedges
- Fuzzy Logic
Interacting with Good Books
- Christian Political Witness
- The Road
- Powers and Submissions
- City of God
- Playing God
- Torture and Eucharist
- How Much is Enough?
- From Willow Creek to Sacred Heart
- The Catonsville Nine
- Daring Greatly
- On Job (GutiƩrrez)
- The Selfless Way of Christ
- World Upside Down
- Are Christians Hate-Filled Hypocrites?
- Christ and Horrors
- The King Jesus Gospel
- Insurrection
- The Bible Made Impossible
- The Deliverance of God
- To Change the World
- Sexuality and the Christian Body
- I Told Me So
- The Teaching of the Twelve
- Evolving in Monkey Town
- Saved from Sacrifice: A Series
- Darwin's Sacred Cause
- Outliers
- A Secular Age
- The God Who Risks
Moral Psychology
- The Dark Spell the Devil Casts: Refugees and Our Slavery to the Fear of Death
- Philia Over Phobia
- Elizabeth Smart and the Psychology of the Christian Purity Culture
- On Love and the Yuck Factor
- Ethnocentrism and Politics
- Flies, Attention and Morality
- The Banality of Evil
- The Ovens at Buchenwald
- Violence and Traffic Lights
- Defending Individualism
- Guilt and Atonement
- The Varieties of Love and Hate
- The Wicked
- Moral Foundations
- Primum non nocere
- The Moral Emotions
- The Moral Circle, Part 1
- The Moral Circle, Part 2
- Taboo Psychology
- The Morality of Mentality
- Moral Conviction
- Infrahumanization
- Holiness and Moral Grammars
The Purity Psychology of Progressive Christianity
The Theology of Everyday Life
- Self-Esteem Through Shaming
- Let Us Be the Heart Of the Church Rather Than the Amygdala
- Online Debates and Stages of Change
- The Devil on a Wiffle Ball Field
- Incarnational Theology and Mental Illness
- Social Media as Sacrament
- The Impossibility of Calvinistic Psychotherapy
- Hating Pixels
- Dress, Divinity and Dumbfounding
- The Kingdom of God Will Not Be Tweeted
- Tattoos
- The Ethics of :-)
- On Snobbery
- Jokes
- Hypocrisy
- Everything I learned about life I learned coaching tee-ball
- Gossip, Part 1: The Food of the Brain
- Gossip, Part 2: Evolutionary Stable Strategies
- Gossip, Part 3: The Pay it Forward World
- Human Nature
- Welcome
- On Humility
Jesus, You're Making Me Tired: Scarcity and Spiritual Formation
A Progressive Vision of the Benedict Option
George MacDonald
Jesus & the Jolly Roger: The Kingdom of God is Like a Pirate
Alone, Suburban & Sorted
The Theology of Monsters
The Theology of Ugly
Orthodox Iconography
Musings On Faith, Belief, and Doubt
- The Meanings Only Faith Can Reveal
- Pragmatism and Progressive Christianity
- Doubt and Cognitive Rumination
- A/theism and the Transcendent
- Kingdom A/theism
- The Ontological Argument
- Cheap Praise and Costly Praise
- god
- Wired to Suffer
- A New Apologetics
- Orthodox Alexithymia
- High and Low: The Psalms and Suffering
- The Buddhist Phase
- Skilled Christianity
- The Two Families of God
- The Bait and Switch of Contemporary Christianity
- Theodicy and No Country for Old Men
- Doubt: A Diagnosis
- Faith and Modernity
- Faith after "The Cognitive Turn"
- Salvation
- The Gifts of Doubt
- A Beautiful Life
- Is Santa Claus Real?
- The Feeling of Knowing
- Practicing Christianity
- In Praise of Doubt
- Skepticism and Conviction
- Pragmatic Belief
- N-Order Complaint and Need for Cognition
Holiday Musings
- Everything I Learned about Christmas I Learned from TV
- Advent: Learning to Wait
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 1
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 2
- It's Still Christmas
- Easter Shouldn't Be Good News
- The Deeper Magic: A Good Friday Meditation
- Palm Sunday with the Orthodox
- Growing Up Catholic: A Lenten Meditation
- The Liturgical Year for Dummies
- "Watching Their Flocks at Night": An Advent Meditation
- Pentecost and Babel
- Epiphany
- Ambivalence about Lent
- On Easter and Astronomy
- Sex Sandals and Advent
- Freud and Valentine's Day
- Existentialism and Halloween
- Halloween Redux: Talking with the Dead
The Offbeat
- Batman and the Joker
- The Theology of Ugly Dolls
- Jesus Would Be a Hufflepuff
- The Moral Example of Captain Jack Sparrow
- Weddings Real, Imagined and Yet to Come
- Michelangelo and Neuroanatomy
- Believing in Bigfoot
- The Kingdom of God as Improv and Flash Mob
- 2012 and the End of the World
- The Polar Express and the Uncanny Valley
- Why the Anti-Christ Is an Idiot
- On Harry Potter and Vampire Movies
Richard,
The dire escapades of Candide are followed by the realization that to work one's garden is enough. I'd never connected that "conclusion" with Ecclesiastes/Stevenson/Beck. Thanks.
But I always smiled to think of Voltaire settling for the homey pleasures of the garden when he's so prone to intellectual flight. I don't mean to be mean, but I smile similarly when that sentiment comes from you. (I also smiled at your romantic ideas of truck driving. Though, what I have found instrumentally appealing about both driving and gardening is that they leave one's mind free to roam--though that's not what Stevenson's "Then do not grasp at the stars, but do life's common work as it comes" is recommending, at least as i see it: I value common work because it frees me to grasp at the (intellectual) stars I love to ponder.)
But here's what I want to bring to your attention. I'll bet penny to pound that either there is a psychological literature that relates tolerance for cognitive dissonance to religious belief outcomes, in which case you can point me toward an area rich for pursuing the Socratic dictum, or there is no such literature, in which case there ought to be and a rich area for psychological research is there for the picking.
Your comment about Hobbes' comment in the cartoon spured this hunch. Hobbes' comment, "Oh, what the heck, I'll take it anyway (life without an afterlife to reward good deeds)," met with your endorsement. Now with some effort I can imagine someone--you--settling on that as the denouement. But to do so I must set aside the cognitive dissonance that burns through that view like a cutting torch--that is, in my mind. It's the "Yeah, but...I'd sure like to know..." that speaks for me (which is to say, there is no denouement).
I don't want to bore anyone with details from my life, but I can assure you that my sensitivity to cognitive dissonance is hard wired. And I am pretty sure that a great many philosophical types through the years share that--it is, I believe, what drove an Aristotle or St. Thomas or Kant or Wittgenstein, etc. to keep pressing on... And the difference between you and me on this may well account for my clapping on the downbeat to your jazz rhythms... For instance, recently, I suggested a way to sort out when pacifism is effective and "right" from when it is complicit and "wrong." You shrugged the suggestion off with a "the world isn't amenable to nice distinctions like that' kind of reply, while I had to slap my hand (metaphorically) to keep from typing back, "Well, do you have any better leads on resolving this?" If I step back from my hard wired compulsion, I can see that neither attitude is "right." (How it hurts me to say that!)
Here's the most interesting part. Dawkins probably is the most famous atheist in the world today, and Plantinga may be the most famous theist, at least among American philosophical types. Now foundational work for each of these men's philosophical positions relates to the same question: what to make of the teleological argument. Dawkins (The Blind Watchmaker): it looks like the world is designed, but we now explain that fact without God. Plantinga (God and Other Minds): that fact is far from explained, and since the teleological argument fails for precisely the same reason that arguments for the existence of other minds fails, if it makes sense to believe I am not the only one with a mind in this world--though sometimes I do think that--it also makes sense to believe in God.
Well, my point is this. One source of molten passion in belief--of all stripes--seems to me to be sensitivity to cognitive dissonance. In fact it is precisely because people like me are so sensitive that people like you sometimes make me want to scream with that "I'll take it anyway" kind of a namby-pamby attitude! And can you believe Kant and James settling for those insipid antinomies?! What girly men! (I am parodying myself!)
If both Dawkins and Plantinga can be understood--in terms of their motivations--by the same root passion, it would be fun to see. And if there is literature that addresses these points, again, please point me to it.
Many thanks!
Tracy
BTW: For those of us who cherish intellectual freedom, the desire to continue pursuing knowedge outstrips (most) other ends. Any orthodoxy will be the enemy to us, so long as it looks like an imposition. I note this for two reasons. First, because it is a paradox for a sensitive cognitive type, such as I am, to love the putsuit of knowledge. (Perhaps it's because your attitude of "the world isn't amenable to distinctions like that" is correct, meaning that the compulsion to keep on trying to resolve the world's inconsistencies is without end.)Second, perhaps I'm just ahead of the curve here--in my own mind at least--but now that scientific orthodoxy pulls harder than the religious variety, I find the faith option to be the free-er.
How does all that brain power fit in your normal size head?
I like the folded sandwich idea.
Hi Tracy,
Fantastic comment.
Let me try to frame what I was after in the Hobbes comment. (BTW, I take, as I'm sure you do to, a perverse pleasure in discussing the ruminations of an imaginary tiger.)
A move I often see theists make with non-theists is that if there be no God then there is no meaning or morality left in life. That, phrased in its most stark form, life wouldn't be worth living if there was no God.
Now I understand that sentiment, I see why people are saying this. But it strikes me as being a bit hysterical. I want to say to these people, "Really? If 'God is dead' you'd just run off and commit suicide?"
The point being is that I do agree with Hobbes. If there was no God I'd take what I have. I would find "value" in living. True, what I have would be deeply infused with poignancy and melancholy, but I would "take it anyway."
But your point is well taken. I guess it is a manner of beginning places. Some would like to begin the "Does God exist?" debate from the "Life wouldn't be worth living" starting point. For myself I'd like to begin any debate with a non-theist from Hobbes' starting point. From there, yes, let the passionate debate begin!
lawtond,
:-)
I don't know if it is brain power. But I get that question a lot. Here, I think, is my secret. I try to create moments in my day to just think about stuff. When I'm not blogging I'm rarely on the computer and I don't watch a lot of TV. I love TV, don't get me wrong, but I only follow a few shows I like (for some strange reason right now I'm hooked on "Ghosthunters" from the SciFi network).
In short, I think everyone finds time to do the things they love to do. Some people love to fish and if I sat with them and talked about fishing they would talk for hours and hours. And I'd eventually ask, "How do you know so much about this? Where do you find the time?" Or another person might love to garden. And if they showed me their backyard I'd be impressed with its beauty and their range of knowledge about how to make things grow. We are all geniuses in our areas of passion, be they writing about theology, fishing, or gardening.
Richard,
I completely agree that the "either there is a God or life is not worth living" view is hysterical. But I think that there is a subvocal dialog that can be unpacked from underlying assumptions of participants in that dialog--like geological strata on which the "debate" sits.
James once wrote about "the radical question of life--whether this be at bottom a moral universe." Theists say yes, atheists no. To the extent that the world seems--to use another apt Jamesian phrase--"amenable to powers we possess [in the moral sphere, applied here--and I paraphrase, since I have to get going...]," the need for God to stand in for our moral failings is lessened. But a person who is skeptical about human nature in this regard will feel a need for "salvation." I happen to see the hopeful view of human nature as extraordinarily naive--which is to say that I agree with the biblical view of humanity as "sinners." And if you look at the earliest New Te4stament writing (Galatians) Paul there calls the Hebrew history of trying to follow the law a "tutor" to show us the futility of trying to be morally "holy." In effect Paul says, God set up that experiment to show you how wrong that optimistic view of human morality is." But history has many other "lessons" for us in that regard.
Beyond this, religiously and metaphysically the question of God will always be open, for the fun reason that investigating it is forever closed to us, that is, unless one takes one's starting point by faith and seeks experiences which can then be read into one's starting paradigm...
I vote for God on another, I hope much less hysterical basis--and I quote James again: (I will take the time to look this one up)not believing in God would be for me "to do violence to a tendency in [my] emotional life which might well be respected as prophetic." (Preface to The Meaning of Truth)
I sometimes hate simplifying like this, because it makes subtle, difficult thoughts come off as glib...
Tracy
Tracy,
I see what you are after. We are all acting on some basic beliefs, beliefs we don't have time or ability to test the validity of. Yet we must act. And, as James argues, some of these truths ennoble and energize us while others do not.
So I can see your frustration at my defaulting to a generally wishy-washy agnostic stance. From a Jamesian perspective it is a dead hypothesis and starting point for life.
You've given my something to think about... :-)
Richard,
A couple of thoughts on going down the Jamesian road here.
First, Kieth Ward, in "Pascal's Fire," has framed the question really well: "...once the evolutionary mechanisms giving rise to moral beliefs have been exposed, the question becomes: is it rationale to follow those beliefs as though they were absolute moral obligations, when I know that they are not?" (p. 54)Ward goes on, "...speaking for myself, I would think it most reasonable to try to maximize [my] own desires, while trying to retain the admiration of the those...people [I] care about. I also think that is how most humans have acted for most of their history. That is precisely why the world is in such a...mess." I suppose that this view lends itself to hystericism, and I regret that, but find it true. James' pragmatic focus cuts through a lot of the self-deception and sham adopted by and foisted on people by religious, political, philosophical--even ethical--dogmas: If I can find a way to label someone else as evil or unworthy or hopeless, It makes it easy to marginalize and exploit them. I am attracted to Tillich, because his view of the cross is that it (should) directly expose that tendency to rationalize evil, and to James, because his pragmatism both eliminates a focus on dogma--thus reducing the force of the impulse to rationalize evil--and because "pragmatism" means a focus on outcome--thereby reducing the tendency to self-deception in rationalizing evil. (Sorry to be so long!)
Second, if you go down the Jamesian road, you will find a long history of criticism already in place. You'll of course want to be appraised of it--and I am sure you probably are to a large extent--but I take most of it to have missed the point, in this way: philosophers tend to be reductionist--a natural product of the tendency (of most philosophers) to systemitize. But James' pragmatism (and pluralism) imply that systemization is of secondary importance to looking at the world. This point returns us to my original complaint about your tendency to value looking to the world more than erecting a systematic way of dealing with a problem. You are more naturally Jamesian in that respect than I--or so it seems by your comments. And I, at least, am willing to parody myself on this rationalistic/reductionist tendency. And BTW: Fundamentalists, brilliant hard core reductionistic scientists like Dawkins, and brilliant Christian analytic philosophers like Plantinga all share that root tendency... So, again, I think it would be fun to see such disparate points of view to be branches of the same tree. But maybe that's just my mean streak...
Thanks for your always stimulating views!
Tracy