Thanks to all of you who voted in the Golden Rule poll. As of this writing:
65 total votes
80% prefer the positive formulation
20% prefer the negative formulation
Those who preferred the positive formulation tended to cite its relative activity over the passivity of the negative formulation.
Okay, why the poll? Well, I, like 80% of you, have tended to favor the positive formulation. I've favored it because it is the Christian formulation and, like many of you, see its active nature as essential to Jesus' vision of aiding the stranger (e.g., the parable of the Good Samaritan).
But I've also been intrigued by the negative formulation. The negative formulation is more common in Eastern religions:
Do not do to others what you do not want them to do to you.
--Confucius, Analects 15:23
My personal favorite example of the negative formulation comes from the Buddhist tradition:
All beings tremble before violence. All fear death. All love life. See yourself in others. Then whom can you hurt?
--from the Dhammapada (my favorite Buddhist text)
An easy way to phrase the negative formulation is the famous ethical dictum: Primum non nocere.
Primum non nocere means "First, do no harm." In Eastern religions this idea is captured by the notion of ahimsa (non-harming). Mahatma Gandhi was the foremost modern prophet of ahimsa:
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.
There are many causes I am prepared to die for, but no causes that I am prepared to kill for.
In my opinion, noncooperation with evil is as much a duty as is cooperation with good. But in the past, noncooperation has been deliberately expressed in violence to the evildoer. I am endeavoring to show to my countrymen that violent noncooperation only multiplies evil, and that as evil can only be sustained by violence, withdrawal of support of evil requires complete abstention from violence.
So, here are my questions for this Part 1 (of 2) in this series:
Has the Christian witness been hampered by not pounding away more forcefully about the negative formulation?
Is there a moral hazard to the skewed 80% of the poll? (And remember, I cast the first vote in the poll for the positive formulation.)
Should we instill more deeply into the bones of church-going folk the idea that our first obligation to others is to do no harm? For example, should children in church first be reared on "First, do no harm" before graduating to the practices of the positive formulation? Would this training be an improvement over our strict adherence to the positive formulation in Christian churches?
Email Subscription on Substack
Richard Beck
Welcome to the blog of Richard Beck, author and professor of psychology at Abilene Christian University (beckr@acu.edu).
The Theology of Faƫrie
The Little Way of St. ThĆ©rĆØse of Lisieux
The William Stringfellow Project (Ongoing)
Autobiographical Posts
- On Discoveries in Used Bookstores
- Two Brothers and Texas Rangers
- Visiting and Evolving in Monkey Town
- Roller Derby Girls
- A Life With Bibles
- Wearing a Crucifix
- Morning Prayer at San Buenaventura Mission
- The Halo of Overalls
- Less
- The Farmer's Market
- Subversion and Shame: I Like the Color Pink
- The Bureaucrat
- Uncle Richard, Vampire Hunter
- Palm Sunday with the Orthodox
- On Maps and Marital Spats
- Get on a Bike...and Go Slow
- Buying a Bible
- Memento Mori
- We Weren't as Good as the Muppets
- Uncle Richard and the Shark
- Growing Up Catholic
- Ghostbusting (Part 1)
- Ghostbusting (Part 2)
- My Eschatological Dog
- Tex Mex and Depression Era Cuisine
- Aliens at Roswell
On the Principalities and Powers
- Christ and the Powers
- Why I Talk about the Devil So Much
- The Preferential Option for the Poor
- The Political Theology of Les MisƩrables
- Good Enough
- On Anarchism and A**holes
- Christian Anarchism
- A Restless Patriotism
- Wink on Exorcism
- Images of God Against Empire
- A Boredom Revolution
- The Medal of St. Benedict
- Exorcisms are about Economics
- "Scooby-Doo, Where Are You?"
- "A Home for Demons...and the Merchants Weep"
- Tales of the Demonic
- The Ethic of Death: The Policies and Procedures Manual
- "All That Are Here Are Humans"
- Ears of Stone
- The War Prayer
- Letter from a Birmingham Jail
Experimental Theology
- Eucharistic Identity
- Tzimtzum, Cruciformity and Theodicy
- Holiness Among Depraved Christians: Paul's New Form of Moral Flourishing
- Empathic Open Theism
- The Victim Needs No Conversion
- The Hormonal God
- Covenantal Substitutionary Atonement
- The Satanic Church
- Mousetrap
- Easter Shouldn't Be Good News
- The Gospel According to Lady Gaga
- Your God is Too Big
From the Prison Bible Study
- The Philosopher
- God's Unconditional Love
- There is a Balm in Gilead
- In Prison With Ann Voskamp
- To Make the Love of God Credible
- Piss Christ in Prison
- Advent: A Prison Story
- Faithful in Little Things
- The Prayer of Jabez
- The Prayer of Willy Brown
- Those Old Time Gospel Songs
- I'll Fly Away
- Singing and Resistence
- Where the Gospel Matters
- Monday Night Bible Study (A Poem)
- Living in Babylon: Reading Revelation in Prison
- Reading the Beatitudes in Prision
- John 13: A Story from the Prision Study
- The Word
Series/Essays Based on my Research
The Theology of Calvin and Hobbes
The Theology of Peanuts
The Snake Handling Churches of Appalachia
Eccentric Christianity
- Part 1: A Peculiar People
- Part 2: The Eccentric God, Transcendence and the Prophetic Imagination
- Part 3: Welcoming God in the Stranger
- Part 4: Enchantment, the Porous Self and the Spirit
- Part 5: Doubt, Gratitude and an Eccentric Faith
- Part 6: The Eccentric Economy of Love
- Part 7: The Eccentric Kingdom
The Fuller Integration Lectures
Blogging about the Bible
- Unicorns in the Bible
- "Let My People Go!": On Worship, Work and Laziness
- The True Troubler
- Stumbling At Just One Point
- The Faith of Demons
- The Lord Saw That She Was Not Loved
- The Subversion of the Creator God
- Hell On Earth: The Church as the Baptism of Fire and the Holy Spirit
- The Things That Make for Peace
- The Lord of the Flies
- On Preterism, the Second Coming and Hell
- Commitment and Violence: A Reading of the Akedah
- Gain Versus Gift in Ecclesiastes
- Redemption and the Goel
- The Psalms as Liberation Theology
- Control Your Vessel
- Circumcised Ears
- Forgive Us Our Trespasses
- Doing Beautiful Things
- The Most Remarkable Sequence in the Bible
- Targeting the Dove Sellers
- Christus Victor in Galatians
- Devoted to Destruction: Reading Cherem Non-Violently
- The Triumph of the Cross
- The Threshing Floor of Araunah
- Hold Others Above Yourself
- Blessed are the Tricksters
- Adam's First Wife
- I Am a Worm
- Christus Victor in the Lord's Prayer
- Let Them Both Grow Together
- Repent
- Here I Am
- Becoming the Jubilee
- Sermon on the Mount: Study Guide
- Treat Them as a Pagan or Tax Collector
- Going Outside the Camp
- Welcoming Children
- The Song of Lamech and the Song of the Lamb
- The Nephilim
- Shaming Jesus
- Pseudepigrapha and the Christian Witness
- The Exclusion and Inclusion of Eunuchs
- The Second Moses
- The New Manna
- Salvation in the First Sermons of the Church
- "A Bloody Husband"
- Song of the Vineyard
Bonhoeffer's Letters from Prision
Civil Rights History and Race Relations
- The Gospel According to Ta-Nehisi Coates (Six Part Series)
- Bus Ride to Justice: Toward Racial Reconciliation in the Churches of Christ
- Black Heroism and White Sympathy: A Reflection on the Charleston Shooting
- Selma 50th Anniversary
- More Than Three Minutes
- The Passion of White America
- Remembering James Chaney, Michael Schwerner and Andrew Goodman
- Will Campbell
- Sitting in the Pews of Ebeneser Baptist Church
- MLK Bedtime Prayer
- Freedom Rider
- Mountiantop
- Freedom Summer
- Civil Rights Family Trip 1: Memphis
- Civil Rights Family Trip 2: Atlanta
- Civil Rights Family Trip 3: Birmingham
- Civil Rights Family Trip 4: Selma
- Civil Rights Family Trip 5: Montgomery
Hip Christianity
The Charism of the Charismatics
Would Jesus Break a Window?: The Hermeneutics of the Temple Action
Being Church
- Instead of a Coffee Shop How About a Laundromat?
- A Million Boring Little Things
- A Prayer for ISIS
- "The People At Our Church Die A Lot"
- The Angel of Freedom
- Washing Dishes at Freedom Fellowship
- Where David Plays the Tambourine
- On Interruptibility
- Mattering
- This Ritual of Hallowing
- Faith as Honoring
- The Beautiful
- The Sensory Boundary
- The Missional and Apostolic Nature of Holiness
- Open Commuion: Warning!
- The Impurity of Love
- A Community Called Forgiveness
- Love is the Allocation of Our Dying
- Freedom Fellowship
- Wednesday Night Church
- The Hands of Christ
- Barbara, Stanley and Andrea: Thoughts on Love, Training and Social Psychology
- Gerald's Gift
- Wiping the Blood Away
- This Morning Jesus Put On Dark Sunglasses
- The Only Way I Know How to Save the World
- Renunciation
- The Reason We Gather
- Anointing With Oil
- Incarnations of God's Mercy
Exploring Preterism
Scripture and Discernment
- Owning Your Protestantism: We Follow Our Conscience, Not the Bible
- Emotional Intelligence and Sola Scriptura
- Songbooks vs. the Psalms
- Biblical as Sociological Stress Test
- Cookie Cutting the Bible: A Case Study
- Pawn to King 4
- Allowing God to Rage
- Poetry of a Murderer
- On Christian Communion: Killing vs. Sexuality
- Heretics and Disagreement
- Atonement: A Primer
- "The Bible says..."
- The "Yes, but..." Church
- Human Experience and the Bible
- Discernment, Part 1
- Discernment, Part 2
- Rabbinic Hedges
- Fuzzy Logic
Interacting with Good Books
- Christian Political Witness
- The Road
- Powers and Submissions
- City of God
- Playing God
- Torture and Eucharist
- How Much is Enough?
- From Willow Creek to Sacred Heart
- The Catonsville Nine
- Daring Greatly
- On Job (GutiƩrrez)
- The Selfless Way of Christ
- World Upside Down
- Are Christians Hate-Filled Hypocrites?
- Christ and Horrors
- The King Jesus Gospel
- Insurrection
- The Bible Made Impossible
- The Deliverance of God
- To Change the World
- Sexuality and the Christian Body
- I Told Me So
- The Teaching of the Twelve
- Evolving in Monkey Town
- Saved from Sacrifice: A Series
- Darwin's Sacred Cause
- Outliers
- A Secular Age
- The God Who Risks
Moral Psychology
- The Dark Spell the Devil Casts: Refugees and Our Slavery to the Fear of Death
- Philia Over Phobia
- Elizabeth Smart and the Psychology of the Christian Purity Culture
- On Love and the Yuck Factor
- Ethnocentrism and Politics
- Flies, Attention and Morality
- The Banality of Evil
- The Ovens at Buchenwald
- Violence and Traffic Lights
- Defending Individualism
- Guilt and Atonement
- The Varieties of Love and Hate
- The Wicked
- Moral Foundations
- Primum non nocere
- The Moral Emotions
- The Moral Circle, Part 1
- The Moral Circle, Part 2
- Taboo Psychology
- The Morality of Mentality
- Moral Conviction
- Infrahumanization
- Holiness and Moral Grammars
The Purity Psychology of Progressive Christianity
The Theology of Everyday Life
- Self-Esteem Through Shaming
- Let Us Be the Heart Of the Church Rather Than the Amygdala
- Online Debates and Stages of Change
- The Devil on a Wiffle Ball Field
- Incarnational Theology and Mental Illness
- Social Media as Sacrament
- The Impossibility of Calvinistic Psychotherapy
- Hating Pixels
- Dress, Divinity and Dumbfounding
- The Kingdom of God Will Not Be Tweeted
- Tattoos
- The Ethics of :-)
- On Snobbery
- Jokes
- Hypocrisy
- Everything I learned about life I learned coaching tee-ball
- Gossip, Part 1: The Food of the Brain
- Gossip, Part 2: Evolutionary Stable Strategies
- Gossip, Part 3: The Pay it Forward World
- Human Nature
- Welcome
- On Humility
Jesus, You're Making Me Tired: Scarcity and Spiritual Formation
A Progressive Vision of the Benedict Option
George MacDonald
Jesus & the Jolly Roger: The Kingdom of God is Like a Pirate
Alone, Suburban & Sorted
The Theology of Monsters
The Theology of Ugly
Orthodox Iconography
Musings On Faith, Belief, and Doubt
- The Meanings Only Faith Can Reveal
- Pragmatism and Progressive Christianity
- Doubt and Cognitive Rumination
- A/theism and the Transcendent
- Kingdom A/theism
- The Ontological Argument
- Cheap Praise and Costly Praise
- god
- Wired to Suffer
- A New Apologetics
- Orthodox Alexithymia
- High and Low: The Psalms and Suffering
- The Buddhist Phase
- Skilled Christianity
- The Two Families of God
- The Bait and Switch of Contemporary Christianity
- Theodicy and No Country for Old Men
- Doubt: A Diagnosis
- Faith and Modernity
- Faith after "The Cognitive Turn"
- Salvation
- The Gifts of Doubt
- A Beautiful Life
- Is Santa Claus Real?
- The Feeling of Knowing
- Practicing Christianity
- In Praise of Doubt
- Skepticism and Conviction
- Pragmatic Belief
- N-Order Complaint and Need for Cognition
Holiday Musings
- Everything I Learned about Christmas I Learned from TV
- Advent: Learning to Wait
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 1
- A Christmas Carol as Resistance Literature: Part 2
- It's Still Christmas
- Easter Shouldn't Be Good News
- The Deeper Magic: A Good Friday Meditation
- Palm Sunday with the Orthodox
- Growing Up Catholic: A Lenten Meditation
- The Liturgical Year for Dummies
- "Watching Their Flocks at Night": An Advent Meditation
- Pentecost and Babel
- Epiphany
- Ambivalence about Lent
- On Easter and Astronomy
- Sex Sandals and Advent
- Freud and Valentine's Day
- Existentialism and Halloween
- Halloween Redux: Talking with the Dead
The Offbeat
- Batman and the Joker
- The Theology of Ugly Dolls
- Jesus Would Be a Hufflepuff
- The Moral Example of Captain Jack Sparrow
- Weddings Real, Imagined and Yet to Come
- Michelangelo and Neuroanatomy
- Believing in Bigfoot
- The Kingdom of God as Improv and Flash Mob
- 2012 and the End of the World
- The Polar Express and the Uncanny Valley
- Why the Anti-Christ Is an Idiot
- On Harry Potter and Vampire Movies
Richard,
Silly me, this is easy, I thought.
And so my first inclination was to choose the "positive." But then I thought, "Why choose at all when I am rarely called on to make this type of decision in the abstract?" So I did not.
My experience over the years has been that human interactions are relational and contextual. So with one person and set of circumstances I may best, most lovingly respond primum non nocere. In another set of circumstances and with another person I may respond doing what I perceive to be the good for the other which I believe is also good for me--knowing full well that the road to Hell (others and mine) is often paved with good intentions.
In Matthew 18:1 ff, Jesus tells us to open our arms to children for his sake and not to cause a child to stumble, not to skandalize the child. That is a clear form of acceptance as well as a clear "do no harm." My sense is that it is best to nurture a child's generosity, curiosity, capacity to love, imagination, individuality, and need to belong by being healthy incarnations of both positive and negative principles.
So which one is it: "Fools rush in where angels fear to tread" or "s/he who hesitates is lost"?
Alas, it ain't easy being me.
Peace (maybe),
George C.
You make a good point about the importance of the negative, especially the principle of "do no harm" before moving to the positive. I'd not thought of it such a way.
In general I am wary of rules. Therefore I highly prefer the negative formulation of this "rule" as it is more limited. Rules, in my experience get abused and lead toward results which are often not consonant with the original intention of the rule. Therefore it is wiser and simpler to keep one's rules straightforward.
Now, when Jesus commands us to love our neighbor - this to me is qualitatively different because it does not prescribe a specific kind of action as the golden rule stated positively does. Love is open to interpretation and outside critique. One can say - you're actions don't seem loving to me. One cannot say - you aren't treating him the way you'd want to be treated because we each differ in how we might like to be treated.
Essentially - with rules, keep them simple and few and phrase them in such a way that they are measurable and open to outside critique.
Otherwise, go in the opposite direction and phrase them abstractly and leave them open to interpretation, but then you're not really dealing with "rules" any longer, but something looser. Perhaps, guidance.
I am not sure if I agree with the idea of teaching the negative aspect and then the positive but I tend to believe that is precisely what we do teach our children, "Don't hit, Don't steal, Don't tease...etc." before teaching them about doing good. In my experience as a mom, my children are likely to do what I tell them NOT to do. As soon as I say to my son don't hit your sister because it's wrong that's the first thing my son does when he gets angry. But when I focus on the positive behavior it seems to give better results. IN the church, and I do have little experience with it, is the same way. When we have preachers always telling the sheep "Don't" and How bad we are, well the results are negative. As soon as the preacher says we 'shouldn't say such and such' I suddenly have a desire to say it more. The more you talk about sin the more I think about sin and the more I think about sin the more I am going to do it. Not saying we shouldn't talk about sin but I think the concept of teaching good first and focusing on the positive will result in postive results...
Good thoughts Richard. As one who thinks Gandhi was right about a lot of things I would certainly like to see the Church emphasize not harming others.
But there's an easy way to distort the negative formulation as well--let it become a principle of 'live and let live'... all well and good, but how is that Christian?
I do think it's somewhat ironic that Christians claim to follow Jesus but see no conflict of interest when they serve in the military... isn't there something wrong when loving your enemy is compatible with killing them? Perhaps this is where the negative formulation would be best employed...
My two cents.
-Daniel-
Mark Twain wrote a short story that applies here, but alas, I can't remember the name of it. It is about a man who walks into a church who is sending its sons' off to war and praying for them. The man, upon hearing their prayer, interprets it for them. When they send their children to war and pray that God spares their lives, they are really asking that their bullets reach their enemies before their enemies bullets reach them (of course, my recall of the story is not as prosaic as Twain's writing).
I wonder how often we hope and pray for success when--if we thought about it--it means the oppression of others: socially, politically, or economically. Is my good life predicated on the harm of others, be it the environment, developing countries, or my competitors?
Just some thoughts.
-Dave
This is a little off topic, but it has to do with what Dave and Daniel commented on as well. I've been preplexed in recent years of the Christian support for war. I do not understand how people can claim to follow the ten commandments and also support an endeavor in which it is the goal to destroy your enemy.
There has been a lot of scholarship comparing the Golden Rule to Kant's
'categorical imperative' - are they equivalent propositions? To me, I find the formulation of Kant: "Always treat other human beings as ends and never means (and that end should always recognize the moral dignity of the person)" to
capture what I believe to be the spirit of the teachings of Jesus and possibly avoid some of the unpleasant consequences of either of Richard's formulations.
This formulation seems to incorporate both 'positive' and 'negative' statements.
Though, I suspect my friend Richard has something else up his sleeve and I await
with attention transfixed.
Peace,
Paul
What about the Old Testament specifically Joshua where they were told by God to kill their enemies, women and children included?
One more thought about not doing harm...
Because I am a follower of Christ and someone comes into my home and they threaten to kill my children I am to just stand and not defend my children? Are we to let opression continue to those who are incapable of defending themselves? Doesn't God want us to seek justice?
Those are good questions Roxanne, but I think there is room for a lot of options between actively harming someone who enters your home and standing and doing nothing. The woman in Atlanta last year(I forget her name) responded to the crazed gunman in her apartment by talking with him about his life and making him pancakes and this ended up descalating a potentially awful situation.
I guess the key point, given this discussion, is how do we develop faithful imaginative responses predicated on doing no harm (or loving one's enemy to put it more strongly)? Forty years ago who would have thought that kneeling on a bridge and allowing police to beat you would absolutely unmask the powerlessness of violence? MLK could imagine faithful responses to violence in ways that I cannot (but I wish to). For me, I just cannot get around the Cross as pointing us to the defeat of violence through sacrificial love, but I have yet to "embody" this well.
Roxanne,
Somehow Joshua keeps popping up in my life. I just completed an exegesis paper on the book of Joshua which I will soon publish on my blog. Until then, may I humbly recommend this set of propositions as an interpretation of Joshua and other books by a pacifist:
http://aricclark.blogspot.com/2006/10/10-propositions-on-violence-in-old.html
Blessings!