But as I've grow up and digested a lot of Biblical and theological scholarship, my view of Jesus has "matured" a bit. I don't reflexively read Jesus as a rebel anymore.
And yet, still doing my year-long Bible reading plan of reading through the Gospel of John over and over each month, I can't help but find myself seeing that outlaw show up.
Consider the healing of the blind man in John 9.
Jesus heals the man by spitting, making mud, and then applying it to the man's eyes. All this, we can assume, was unnecessary. So why did Jesus do it?
Well, as the story unfolds the making of mud was considered a violation of the Sabbath laws. Jesus engaged in work in making the mud. This infraction becomes a huge problem. Sign and sin have been conflated, creating a snarl of a discernment question. How can a sinner perform such a sign? Ultimately, the Pharisees can't see the sign for the sin, but the (formerly) blind man is able to.
A second time they summoned the man who had been blind. “Give glory to God by telling the truth,” they said. “We know this man is a sinner.”
He replied, “Whether he is a sinner or not, I don’t know. One thing I do know. I was blind but now I see!”